On the Quantum and Tempo of Fertility: Comment
Imhoff and Keilman respond to John Bongaarts and Griffith Feeney's adjustment procedure, demonstrating that is not capable of isolating the pure quantum effect of year-to-year changes in fertility. Their critique focuses on two points: Cohort-specific changes in timing are much more complex tha...
Saved in:
Published in | Population and development review Vol. 26; no. 3; pp. 549 - 553 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.09.2000
The Population Council The Population Council, Inc John Wiley & Sons, Inc Population Council |
Series | Population and Development Review |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Imhoff and Keilman respond to John Bongaarts and Griffith Feeney's adjustment procedure, demonstrating that is not capable of isolating the pure quantum effect of year-to-year changes in fertility. Their critique focuses on two points: Cohort-specific changes in timing are much more complex than Bongaarts and Feeney assume, and the Bongaarts and Feeney method is based on unsuitable fertility measures. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-SKV926NB-J ArticleID:PADR549 istex:D53CC263225D6D1A81E9E7A6927A981F91626AF8 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0098-7921 1728-4457 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00549.x |