Allometry of the quasi-pipe (qPipe) model for estimating tree leaf area and tree leaf mass applied to plant functional types

The allometry of the pipe model quantifies the approximate proportionality between the tree leaf amount and the stem cross-sectional area at the crown base ( A CB ). It is useful for estimating and modeling carbon fixation abilities of trees but requires climbing the tree and is thus unsuitable for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScientific reports Vol. 13; no. 1; p. 9954
Main Authors Sumida, Akihiro, Inagaki, Yoshiyuki, Kajimoto, Takuya, Katsuno-Miyaura, Masumi, Komiyama, Akira, Kurachi, Nahoko, Miyaura, Tomiyasu, Hasegawa, Shigeaki F., Hara, Toshihiko, Ono, Kiyomi, Yamada, Masahito
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 19.06.2023
Nature Publishing Group
Nature Portfolio
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The allometry of the pipe model quantifies the approximate proportionality between the tree leaf amount and the stem cross-sectional area at the crown base ( A CB ). It is useful for estimating and modeling carbon fixation abilities of trees but requires climbing the tree and is thus unsuitable for large-scale studies. Here, we adopted a previously proposed allometry (hereafter the quasi-pipe (qPipe) model allometry) formulating the relationship between the tree leaf amount and a surrogate of A CB , A CB_Est , calculated from tree dimensions measurable from the ground. Using published/unpublished data for 962 trees of 159 species collected between tropical rainforests and boreal forests, we established pipe and qPipe model allometries for evergreen-conifer, deciduous-conifer, evergreen-broadleaf, and deciduous-broadleaf plant functional types (PFTs). For the leaf area per tree (LA), allometric lines on a log–log plane were almost identical among the four PFTs in both models, with slopes of ~ 1. For the leaf mass per tree (LM), however, the allometric lines separated among the four PFTs in both models and had slopes greater than 1, indicating that the proportionality assumed in the pipe model held for LA but not LM. The applicability of the qPipe model in estimating the stand-scale leaf amount was further examined.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-37112-1