Deceptive orbital confinement at edges and pores of carbon-based 1D and 2D nanoarchitectures

The electronic structure defines the properties of graphene-based nanomaterials. Scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy (STM/STS) experiments on graphene nanoribbons (GNRs), nanographenes, and nanoporous graphene (NPG) often determine an apparent electronic orbital confinement into the edges and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNature communications Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 1062 - 9
Main Authors Piquero-Zulaica, Ignacio, Corral-Rascón, Eduardo, Diaz de Cerio, Xabier, Riss, Alexander, Yang, Biao, Garcia-Lekue, Aran, Kher-Elden, Mohammad A., Abd El-Fattah, Zakaria M., Nobusue, Shunpei, Kojima, Takahiro, Seufert, Knud, Sakaguchi, Hiroshi, Auwärter, Willi, Barth, Johannes V.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 05.02.2024
Nature Publishing Group
Nature Portfolio
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The electronic structure defines the properties of graphene-based nanomaterials. Scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy (STM/STS) experiments on graphene nanoribbons (GNRs), nanographenes, and nanoporous graphene (NPG) often determine an apparent electronic orbital confinement into the edges and nanopores, leading to dubious interpretations such as image potential states or super-atom molecular orbitals. We show that these measurements are subject to a wave function decay into the vacuum that masks the undisturbed electronic orbital shape. We use Au(111)-supported semiconducting gulf-type GNRs and NPGs as model systems fostering frontier orbitals that appear confined along the edges and nanopores in STS measurements. DFT calculations confirm that these states originate from valence and conduction bands. The deceptive electronic orbital confinement observed is caused by a loss of Fourier components, corresponding to states of high momentum. This effect can be generalized to other 1D and 2D carbon-based nanoarchitectures and is important for their use in catalysis and sensing applications. The apparent electronic confinement at nanographene boundaries in scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy is often misinterpreted. Here, the authors explain this phenomenon in terms of the decay of frontier orbitals and confinement at the edges of graphene nanoribbons and pores in nanoporous graphene.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2041-1723
2041-1723
DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-45138-w