Remittances and Inequality: A Question of Migration Stage and Geographic Scale

Over the past decade, the benefits from economic globalization have bypassed most developing countries, and as a result international wage-labor migration has taken on new importance. The impact of remittances on migrant origins is still, however, a subject of considerable debate. Some researchers f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEconomic geography Vol. 74; no. 1; pp. 8 - 25
Main Author Jones, Richard C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Routledge 01.01.1998
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Clark University
Clark Univ
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Over the past decade, the benefits from economic globalization have bypassed most developing countries, and as a result international wage-labor migration has taken on new importance. The impact of remittances on migrant origins is still, however, a subject of considerable debate. Some researchers find that remittances tend to increase income inequalities, whereas others find just the opposite-even, upon occasion, when they are writing about the same place. This study offers a spatiotemporal perspective in which the stage of migration and the spatial scale at which inequalities are measured are conceptualized as controls that help explain these divergent views. I describe a case study, based on 1988 household survey data collected in central Zacatecas state, Mexico. Interfamilial inequalities are found first to decrease and then to increase as a place's migration experience deepens. Throughout this experience, however, rural incomes improve relative to urban ones, since remittances are targeted to the predominantly rural areas of origin.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-84RN1VWG-7
ArticleID:ECGE8
istex:D32A5DA1F7E03C6A8800E21A1C8EF7FEAA2DC9C7
The author would like to acknowledge the National Science Foundation for a generous grant (#SES‐8619504) in support of the empirical research on Zacatecas. Special appreciation is extended to Maria Maya Jones, Michael Perez, Lourdes Orta, Beatriz Ramírez, Amilcar Saavedra, David Alvírez, Avelardo Valdez, and to two anonymous reviewers, as well as the copyeditor, Jeri Stolk, for their help.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0013-0095
1944-8287
DOI:10.1111/j.1944-8287.1998.tb00102.x