Remittances and Inequality: A Question of Migration Stage and Geographic Scale
Over the past decade, the benefits from economic globalization have bypassed most developing countries, and as a result international wage-labor migration has taken on new importance. The impact of remittances on migrant origins is still, however, a subject of considerable debate. Some researchers f...
Saved in:
Published in | Economic geography Vol. 74; no. 1; pp. 8 - 25 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Routledge
01.01.1998
Blackwell Publishing Ltd Clark University Clark Univ Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Over the past decade, the benefits from economic globalization have bypassed most developing countries, and as a result international wage-labor migration has taken on new importance. The impact of remittances on migrant origins is still, however, a subject of considerable debate. Some researchers find that remittances tend to increase income inequalities, whereas others find just the opposite-even, upon occasion, when they are writing about the same place. This study offers a spatiotemporal perspective in which the stage of migration and the spatial scale at which inequalities are measured are conceptualized as controls that help explain these divergent views. I describe a case study, based on 1988 household survey data collected in central Zacatecas state, Mexico. Interfamilial inequalities are found first to decrease and then to increase as a place's migration experience deepens. Throughout this experience, however, rural incomes improve relative to urban ones, since remittances are targeted to the predominantly rural areas of origin. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-84RN1VWG-7 ArticleID:ECGE8 istex:D32A5DA1F7E03C6A8800E21A1C8EF7FEAA2DC9C7 The author would like to acknowledge the National Science Foundation for a generous grant (#SES‐8619504) in support of the empirical research on Zacatecas. Special appreciation is extended to Maria Maya Jones, Michael Perez, Lourdes Orta, Beatriz Ramírez, Amilcar Saavedra, David Alvírez, Avelardo Valdez, and to two anonymous reviewers, as well as the copyeditor, Jeri Stolk, for their help. ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0013-0095 1944-8287 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1944-8287.1998.tb00102.x |