Interaction of chemoreceptor and baroreceptor reflexes by hypoxia and hypercapnia â a mechanism for promoting hypertension in obstructive sleep apnoea
Asphyxia, which occurs during obstructive sleep apnoeic events, alters the baroreceptor reflex and this may lead to hypertension. We have recently reported that breathing an asphyxic gas resets the baroreceptorâvascular resistance reflex towards higher pressures. The present study was designed to...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of physiology Vol. 568; no. 2; pp. 677 - 687 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
9600 Garsington Road , Oxford , OX4 2DQ , UK
The Physiological Society
15.10.2005
Blackwell Science Ltd Blackwell Science Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Asphyxia, which occurs during obstructive sleep apnoeic events, alters the baroreceptor reflex and this may lead to hypertension.
We have recently reported that breathing an asphyxic gas resets the baroreceptorâvascular resistance reflex towards higher
pressures. The present study was designed to determine whether this effect was caused by the reduced oxygen tension, which
affects mainly peripheral chemoreceptors, or by the increased carbon dioxide, which acts mainly on central chemoreceptors.
We studied 11 healthy volunteer subjects aged between 20 and 55 years old (6 male). The stimulus to the carotid baroreceptors
was changed using graded pressures of â40 to +60 mmHg applied to a neck chamber. Responses of vascular resistance were assessed
in the forearm from changes in blood pressure (Finapres) divided by brachial blood flow velocity (Doppler) and cardiac responses
from the changes in RR interval and heart rate. Stimulusâresponse curves were defined during (i) air breathing, (ii) hypoxia
(12% O 2 in N 2 ), and (iii) hypercapnia (5% CO 2 in 95% O 2 ). Responses during air breathing were assessed both prior to and after either hypoxia or hypercapnia. We applied a sigmoid
function or third order polynomial to the curves and determined the maximal differential (equivalent to peak sensitivity)
and the corresponding carotid sinus pressure (equivalent to âset pointâ). Hypoxia resulted in an increase in heart rate but
no significant change in mean blood pressure or vascular resistance. However, there was an increase in vascular resistance
in the post-stimulus period. Hypoxia had no significant effect on baroreflex sensitivity or âset pointâ for the control of
RR interval, heart rate or mean arterial pressure. Peak sensitivity of the vascular resistance response to baroreceptor stimulation
was significantly reduced from â2.5 ± 0.4 units to â1.4 ± 0.1 units ( P < 0.05) and this was restored in the post-stimulus period to â2.6 ± 0.5 units. There was no effect on âset pointâ. Hypercapnia,
on the other hand, resulted in a decrease in heart rate, which remained reduced in the post-stimulus period and significantly
increased mean blood pressure. Baseline vascular resistance was significantly increased and then further increased in the
post-control period. Like hypoxia, hypercapnia had no effect on baroreflex control of RR interval, heart rate or mean arterial
pressure. There was, also no significant change in the sensitivity of the vascular resistance responses, however, âset pointâ
was significantly increased from 74.7 ± 4 to 87.0 ± 2 mmHg ( P < 0.02). This was not completely restored to pre-stimulus control levels in the post-stimulus control period (82.2 ± 3 mmHg).
These results suggest that the hypoxic component of asphyxia reduces baroreceptorâvascular resistance reflex sensitivity,
whilst the hypercapnic component is responsible for increasing blood pressure and reflex âset pointâ. Hypercapnia appears
to have a lasting effect after the removal of the stimulus. Thus the effect of both peripheral and central chemoreceptors
on baroreflex function may contribute to promoting hypertension in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0022-3751 1469-7793 |
DOI: | 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.094151 |