Conceptualising State Capacity: Comparing Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan

Strengthening the state is central to the post-communist reform agenda. Here, state capacity combines organisational, material and social resources and is conceptualised along four dimensions: ideational, political, technical and implementational. This conceptualisation is applied to a comparative,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPolitical studies Vol. 52; no. 4; pp. 685 - 708
Main Authors Cummings, Sally N., Nørgaard, Ole
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2004
SAGE Publications
Political Studies Association
Sage Publications Ltd
SeriesPolitical Studies
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Strengthening the state is central to the post-communist reform agenda. Here, state capacity combines organisational, material and social resources and is conceptualised along four dimensions: ideational, political, technical and implementational. This conceptualisation is applied to a comparative, survey-based analysis in 2002 of 125 medium-ranking officials in two post-communist Central Asian countries, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. The findings reveal that although Kazakhstan's controlled economic reform programme and natural resources have placed it in a stronger position to develop its state capacity, important ideational, political and implementational problems pose long-term obstacles for reform. In turn, Kyrgyzstan's early liberalisation in the absence of economic and social resources may be serving to undermine its state capacity.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-LG16DHCH-2
istex:D0C46BB371BD2637C8151DBE788B295D09F98D1C
ArticleID:POST503
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0032-3217
1467-9248
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00503.x