Conceptualising State Capacity: Comparing Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan
Strengthening the state is central to the post-communist reform agenda. Here, state capacity combines organisational, material and social resources and is conceptualised along four dimensions: ideational, political, technical and implementational. This conceptualisation is applied to a comparative,...
Saved in:
Published in | Political studies Vol. 52; no. 4; pp. 685 - 708 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.12.2004
SAGE Publications Political Studies Association Sage Publications Ltd |
Series | Political Studies |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Strengthening the state is central to the post-communist reform agenda. Here, state capacity combines organisational, material and social resources and is conceptualised along four dimensions: ideational, political, technical and implementational. This conceptualisation is applied to a comparative, survey-based analysis in 2002 of 125 medium-ranking officials in two post-communist Central Asian countries, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. The findings reveal that although Kazakhstan's controlled economic reform programme and natural resources have placed it in a stronger position to develop its state capacity, important ideational, political and implementational problems pose long-term obstacles for reform. In turn, Kyrgyzstan's early liberalisation in the absence of economic and social resources may be serving to undermine its state capacity. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-LG16DHCH-2 istex:D0C46BB371BD2637C8151DBE788B295D09F98D1C ArticleID:POST503 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0032-3217 1467-9248 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00503.x |