Biological conduit small gap sleeve bridging method for peripheral nerve injury: regeneration law of nerve fibers in the conduit

The clinical effects of 2-mm small gap sleeve bridging of the biological conduit to repair periph- eral nerve injury are better than in the traditional epineurium suture, so it is possible to replace the epineurium suture in the treatment of peripheral nerve injury. This study sought to identify the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeural regeneration research Vol. 10; no. 1; pp. 71 - 78
Main Authors Zhang, Pei-Xun, Li-Ya, A, Kou, Yu-Hui, Yin, Xiao-Feng, Xue, Feng, Han, Na, Wang, Tian-Bing, Jiang, Bao-Guo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published India Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd 2015
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The clinical effects of 2-mm small gap sleeve bridging of the biological conduit to repair periph- eral nerve injury are better than in the traditional epineurium suture, so it is possible to replace the epineurium suture in the treatment of peripheral nerve injury. This study sought to identify the regeneration law of nerve fibers in the biological conduit. A nerve regeneration chamber was constructed in models of sciatic nerve injury using 2-mm small gap sleeve bridging of a biodegradable biological conduit. The results showed that the biological conduit had good his- tocompatibility. Tissue and cell apoptosis in the conduit apparently lessened, and regenerating nerve fibers were common. The degeneration regeneration law of Schwann cells and axons in the conduit was quite different from that in traditional epineurium suture. During the prime period for nerve fiber regeneration (2-8 weeks), the number of Schwann cells and nerve fibers was higher in both proximal and distal ends, and the effects of the small gap sleeve bridging method were better than those of the traditional epineurium suture. The above results provide an objec- tive and reliable theoretical basis for the clinical application of the biological conduit small gap sleeve bridging method to repair peripheral nerve injury.
Bibliography:The clinical effects of 2-mm small gap sleeve bridging of the biological conduit to repair periph- eral nerve injury are better than in the traditional epineurium suture, so it is possible to replace the epineurium suture in the treatment of peripheral nerve injury. This study sought to identify the regeneration law of nerve fibers in the biological conduit. A nerve regeneration chamber was constructed in models of sciatic nerve injury using 2-mm small gap sleeve bridging of a biodegradable biological conduit. The results showed that the biological conduit had good his- tocompatibility. Tissue and cell apoptosis in the conduit apparently lessened, and regenerating nerve fibers were common. The degeneration regeneration law of Schwann cells and axons in the conduit was quite different from that in traditional epineurium suture. During the prime period for nerve fiber regeneration (2-8 weeks), the number of Schwann cells and nerve fibers was higher in both proximal and distal ends, and the effects of the small gap sleeve bridging method were better than those of the traditional epineurium suture. The above results provide an objec- tive and reliable theoretical basis for the clinical application of the biological conduit small gap sleeve bridging method to repair peripheral nerve injury.
nerve regeneration; peripheral nerve; small gap; axons; Schwann cells; repair; injury;biological conduit; NSFC grants; neural regeneration
11-5422/R
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Author contributions: NH and YHK participated in study concept and design. PXZ and BGJ were responsible for fundraising. LYA provided the data and performed experiments. PXZ wrote the manuscript. FX was in charge of manuscript authorization. XFY and TBW articipated in statistical analysis. All authors approved the final version of the paper.
ISSN:1673-5374
1876-7958
DOI:10.4103/1673-5374.150709