Information integration in multiple cue judgment: A division of labor hypothesis

There is considerable evidence that judgment is constrained to additive integration of information. The authors propose an explanation of why serial and additive cognitive integration can produce accurate multiple cue judgment both in additive and non-additive environments in terms of an adaptive di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCognition Vol. 106; no. 1; pp. 259 - 298
Main Authors Juslin, Peter, Karlsson, Linnea, Olsson, Henrik
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 2008
Elsevier
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There is considerable evidence that judgment is constrained to additive integration of information. The authors propose an explanation of why serial and additive cognitive integration can produce accurate multiple cue judgment both in additive and non-additive environments in terms of an adaptive division of labor between multiple representations. It is hypothesized that, whereas the additive, independent linear effect of each cue can be explicitly abstracted and integrated by a serial, additive judgment process, a variety of sophisticated task properties, like non-additive cue combination, non-linear relations, and inter-cue correlation, are carried implicitly by exemplar memory. Three experiments investigating the effect of additive versus non-additive cue combination verify the predicted shift in cognitive representations as a function of the underlying combination rule.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0010-0277
1873-7838
1873-7838
DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.003