Strategies to exclude subjects who conceal and fabricate information when enrolling in clinical trials

• Published in: Contemporary clinical trials communications Vol. 5; no. C; pp. 67 - 71
• Main Authors: Devine, Eric G, Peebles, Kristina R, Martini, Valeria
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01.03.2017; Elsevier
• Subjects: Clinical trials; Other; Professional research participants; Professional subjects; Recruiting participants; Recruitment strategies; Subject dishonesty; Subject registry; Subject registry; Professional subjects; Clinical trials; Subject dishonesty; Professional research participants; Recruitment strategies; Recruiting participants
• ISSN: 2451-8654; 2451-8654
• DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.12.005

Abstract Clinical trials within the US face an increasing challenge with the recruitment of quality candidates. One readily available group of subjects that have high rates of participation in clinical research are subjects who enroll in multiple trials for the purpose of generating income through study payments. Aside from issues of safety and generalizability, evidence suggests that these subjects employ methods of deception to qualify for the strict entrance criteria of some studies, including concealing information and fabricating information. Including these subjects in research poses a significant risk to the integrity of data quality and study designs. Strategies to limit enrollment of subjects whose motivation is generating income have not been systematically addressed in the literature. The present paper is intended to provide investigators with a range of strategies for developing and implementing a study protocol with protections to minimize the enrollment of subjects whose primary motivation for enrolling is to generate income. This multifaceted approach includes recommendations for advertising strategies, payment strategies, telephone screening strategies, and baseline screening strategies. The approach also includes recommendations for attending to inconsistent study data and subject motivation. Implementing these strategies may be more or less important depending upon the vulnerability of the study design to subject deception. Although these strategies may help researchers exclude subjects with a higher rate of deceptive practices, widespread adoption of subject registries would go a long way to decrease the chances of subjects enrolling in multiple studies or more than once in the same study.