Eugenol Enrichment of Clove Bud Essential Oil Using Different Microwave-assisted Distillation Methods

Clove bud (Syzygium aromaticum) essential oils (EOs) were extracted by hydro-distillation (HD), steam-distillation (SD), microwave-assisted hydro-distillation (MAHD), and microwave-assisted steam-distillation (MASD) methods. A comparison was made between microwave-assisted extraction and conventiona...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH Vol. 23; no. 3; pp. 385 - 394
Main Authors Golmakani, Mohammad-Taghi, Zare, Mahdieh, Razzaghi, Saeedeh
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Tsukuba Japanese Society for Food Science and Technology 2017
The Japanese Society for Food Science and Technology
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Clove bud (Syzygium aromaticum) essential oils (EOs) were extracted by hydro-distillation (HD), steam-distillation (SD), microwave-assisted hydro-distillation (MAHD), and microwave-assisted steam-distillation (MASD) methods. A comparison was made between microwave-assisted extraction and conventional extraction methods in terms of extraction kinetic, chemical composition, eugenol enrichment and antioxidant activity. Significant differences were observed between the ultimate EO yields of HD-based methods (12.98 – 13.94%) and those of SD-based methods (11.54 – 12.71%). Nonetheless, chemical compositions of the four extracted EOs were similar, but significant differences occurred among the quantity of compounds in the EOs. The ratio of eugenol per eugenyl acetate in HD-based methods (8.36 – 11.90%) was higher than those of SD-based methods (5.28 – 5.81%). These differences result from the hydrolysis of eugenyl acetate to eugenol in HD-based methods. Although, there was no significant difference between antioxidant activity of EOs extracted by microwave-assisted extraction methods and conventional-based methods but, accordingly, there were significant differences between HD-based methods and SD-based methods.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1344-6606
1881-3984
DOI:10.3136/fstr.23.385