Ultraviolet Plumage Colors Predict Mate Preferences in Starlings

Avian plumage has long been used to test theories of sexual selection, with humans assessing the colors. However, many birds see in the ultraviolet (<400 nm), to which humans are blind. Consequently, it is important to know whether natural variation in UV reflectance from plumage functions in sex...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 94; no. 16; pp. 8618 - 8621
Main Authors Andrew T. D. Bennett, Cuthill, Innes C., Partridge, Julian C., Lunau, Klaus
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 05.08.1997
National Acad Sciences
National Academy of Sciences
The National Academy of Sciences of the USA
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Avian plumage has long been used to test theories of sexual selection, with humans assessing the colors. However, many birds see in the ultraviolet (<400 nm), to which humans are blind. Consequently, it is important to know whether natural variation in UV reflectance from plumage functions in sexual signaling. We show that female starlings rank males differently when UV wavelengths are present or absent. Principal component analysis of ≈ 1300 reflectance spectra (300-700 nm) taken from sexually dimorphic plumage regions of males predicted preference under the UV+ treatment. Under UV- conditions, females ranked males in a different and nonrandom order, but plumage reflectance in the human visible spectrum did not predict choice. Natural variation in UV reflectance is thus important in avian mate assessment, and the prevailing light environment can have profound effects on observed mating preferences.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
Richard Southwood, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
To whom reprint requests should be addressed. e-mail: Andy.Bennett@bris.ac.uk.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.94.16.8618