Adjuvant tamoxifen and exemestane in early breast cancer (TEAM): a randomised phase 3 trial

Summary Background Aromatase inhibitors improved disease-free survival compared with tamoxifen when given as an initial adjuvant treatment or after 2–3 years of tamoxifen to postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. We therefore compared the long-term effects of exemestane m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Lancet (British edition) Vol. 377; no. 9762; pp. 321 - 331
Main Authors van de Velde, Cornelis JH, Prof, Rea, Daniel, MD, Seynaeve, Caroline, MD, Putter, Hein, Prof, Hasenburg, Annette, Prof, Vannetzel, Jean-Michel, MD, Paridaens, Robert, Prof, Markopoulos, Christos, Prof, Hozumi, Yasuo, MD, Hille, Elysee TM, PhD, Kieback, Dirk G, MD, Asmar, Lina, PhD, Smeets, Jan, BSc, Nortier, Johan WR, Prof, Hadji, Peyman, Prof, Bartlett, John MS, PhD, Jones, Stephen E, MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 22.01.2011
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Background Aromatase inhibitors improved disease-free survival compared with tamoxifen when given as an initial adjuvant treatment or after 2–3 years of tamoxifen to postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. We therefore compared the long-term effects of exemestane monotherapy with sequential treatment (tamoxifen followed by exemestane). Methods The Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) phase 3 trial was conducted in hospitals in nine countries. Postmenopausal women (median age 64 years, range 35–96) with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to open-label exemestane (25 mg once a day, orally) alone or following tamoxifen (20 mg once a day, orally) for 5 years. Randomisation was by use of a computer-generated random permuted block method. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years. Main analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT00279448 , NCT00032136 , and NCT00036270 ; NTR 267 ; Ethics Commission Trial 27/2001 ; and UMIN , C000000057. Findings 9779 patients were assigned to sequential treatment (n=4875) or exemestane alone (n=4904), and 4868 and 4898 were analysed by intention to treat, respectively. 4154 (85%) patients in the sequential group and 4186 (86%) in the exemestane alone group were disease free at 5 years (hazard ratio 0·97, 95% CI 0·88–1·08; p=0·60). In the safety analysis, sequential treatment was associated with a higher incidence of gynaecological symptoms (942 [20%] of 4814 vs 523 [11%] of 4852), venous thrombosis (99 [2%] vs 47 [1%]), and endometrial abnormalities (191 [4%] vs 19 [<1%]) than was exemestane alone. Musculoskeletal adverse events (2448 [50%] vs 2133 [44%]), hypertension (303 [6%] vs 219 [5%]), and hyperlipidaemia (230 [5%] vs 136 [3%]) were reported more frequently with exemestane alone. Interpretation Treatment regimens of exemestane alone or after tamoxifen might be judged to be appropriate options for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer. Funding Pfizer.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62312-4
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0140-6736
1474-547X
DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62312-4