The controversial existence of the human superior fronto-occipital fasciculus: Connectome-based tractographic study with microdissection validation

The superior fronto‐occipital fasciculus (SFOF), a long association bundle that connects frontal and occipital lobes, is well‐documented in monkeys but is controversial in human brain. Its assumed role is in visual processing and spatial awareness. To date, anatomical and neuroimaging studies on hum...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman brain mapping Vol. 36; no. 12; pp. 4964 - 4971
Main Authors Meola, Antonio, Comert, Ayhan, Yeh, Fang-Cheng, Stefaneanu, Lucia, Fernandez-Miranda, Juan C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2015
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The superior fronto‐occipital fasciculus (SFOF), a long association bundle that connects frontal and occipital lobes, is well‐documented in monkeys but is controversial in human brain. Its assumed role is in visual processing and spatial awareness. To date, anatomical and neuroimaging studies on human and animal brains are not in agreement about the existence, course, and terminations of SFOF. To clarify the existence of the SFOF in human brains, we applied deterministic fiber tractography to a template of 488 healthy subjects and to 80 individual subjects from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) and validated the results with white matter microdissection of post‐mortem human brains. The imaging results showed that previous reconstructions of the SFOF were generated by two false continuations, namely between superior thalamic peduncle (STP) and stria terminalis (ST), and ST and posterior thalamic peduncle. The anatomical microdissection confirmed this finding. No other fiber tracts in the previously described location of the SFOF were identified. Hence, our data suggest that the SFOF does not exist in the human brain. Hum Brain Mapp 36:4964–4971, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:ArticleID:HBM22990
NIH - No. R01DC013803-01A1
istex:E6F44486A16CAC59A9C4D49377845F8521D15DF3
University of Pittsburgh Brain Institute
ark:/67375/WNG-CCJ4JK43-F
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1065-9471
1097-0193
1097-0193
DOI:10.1002/hbm.22990