Shared subjective views, intent to cooperate and tax compliance: Similarities between Australian taxpayers and tax officers

The present study investigates how taxation is represented in the minds of Australian taxpayers and tax officers and whether shared beliefs and evaluations are related to taxpayer compliance. Shared tax views are assumed to facilitate positive interaction, and mutual satisfactory interaction to enha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of economic psychology Vol. 27; no. 4; pp. 502 - 517
Main Authors Kirchler, Erich, Niemirowski, Apolonia, Wearing, Alexander
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.08.2006
Elsevier Science
Elsevier
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
SeriesJournal of Economic Psychology
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The present study investigates how taxation is represented in the minds of Australian taxpayers and tax officers and whether shared beliefs and evaluations are related to taxpayer compliance. Shared tax views are assumed to facilitate positive interaction, and mutual satisfactory interaction to enhance taxpayers’ willingness to cooperate and comply. The sample comprised 292 compliant taxpayers, 547 non-compliant taxpayers identified by the Australian Tax Office (ATO), and 358 ATO officers who had direct contact with taxpayers. Shared perceptions were measured as similarity in beliefs and evaluations of tax law complexity, tax mentality, ethics and social norms, horizontal and vertical distributive fairness and fair exchange with the government, attitudes towards the government, and judgments of tax officers and tax preparers’ support. The ATO reported non-compliance was found to be related to respondents’ willingness to cooperate (i.e., filing timely and correctly) which, in turn, was related to respondents’ beliefs and evaluation of tax issues and their shared views on these issues. Willingness to cooperate appears to function as a mediator between tax compliance and taxpayer’s beliefs and evaluations as well as shared tax officials’ and taxpayers’ views.
ISSN:0167-4870
1872-7719
DOI:10.1016/j.joep.2006.01.005