Inhibition of SARS–CoV-2 by type I and type III interferons
The recently emerged severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS–CoV-2) is the causative agent of the devastating COVID-19 lung disease pandemic. Here, we tested the inhibitory activities of the antiviral interferons of type I (IFN-α) and type III (IFN-λ) against SARS–CoV-2 and compared th...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of biological chemistry Vol. 295; no. 41; pp. 13958 - 13964 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
09.10.2020
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The recently emerged severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS–CoV-2) is the causative agent of the devastating COVID-19 lung disease pandemic. Here, we tested the inhibitory activities of the antiviral interferons of type I (IFN-α) and type III (IFN-λ) against SARS–CoV-2 and compared them with those against SARS–CoV-1, which emerged in 2003. Using two mammalian epithelial cell lines (human Calu-3 and simian Vero E6), we found that both IFNs dose-dependently inhibit SARS–CoV-2. In contrast, SARS–CoV-1 was restricted only by IFN-α in these cell lines. SARS–CoV-2 generally exhibited a broader IFN sensitivity than SARS–CoV-1. Moreover, ruxolitinib, an inhibitor of IFN-triggered Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription signaling, boosted SARS–CoV-2 replication in the IFN-competent Calu-3 cells. We conclude that SARS–CoV-2 is sensitive to exogenously added IFNs. This finding suggests that type I and especially the less adverse effect–prone type III IFN are good candidates for the management of COVID-19. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Edited by Craig E. Cameron |
ISSN: | 0021-9258 1083-351X 1083-351X |
DOI: | 10.1074/jbc.AC120.013788 |