Survey on the current situation for early diagnosis of dementia and contributing factors in Japan

Background Early diagnosis of dementia is important for both initiation of non‐pharmacological activities to slow cognitive decline as well as the development of disease‐modifying drugs; however, it appears there may be a tendency for formal diagnosis to be delayed. Since the current status of diagn...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychogeriatrics Vol. 24; no. 2; pp. 312 - 321
Main Authors Kumagai, Ryoko, Sonoda, Yuma, Kowa, Hisatomo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Melbourne John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 01.03.2024
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1346-3500
1479-8301
1479-8301
DOI10.1111/psyg.13075

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background Early diagnosis of dementia is important for both initiation of non‐pharmacological activities to slow cognitive decline as well as the development of disease‐modifying drugs; however, it appears there may be a tendency for formal diagnosis to be delayed. Since the current status of diagnosis in Japan is unclear, we conducted a survey with family caregivers of patients with dementia using questionnaires and interviews to investigate the factors regarding the dementia diagnosis process in Japan. Methods We distributed questionnaires to family caregivers of people with dementia and conducted additional follow‐up interviews with approximately half of them. We calculated odds ratios for the time to diagnosis using logistic regression analysis for each characteristic from the questionnaire data. We also created co‐occurrence networks from the interview data in order to provide qualitative context to the questionnaire data. Results We collected 68 questionnaires and conducted 32 interviews. The median time to diagnosis was 12 months, and logistic regression analysis showed a significant trend toward shorter time to diagnosis in the absence of other caregivers. In addition, there were significant differences in age, relationship with patients and the time from the first visit to the final diagnosis between groups with and without other caregivers. Conclusions The results of this study suggest that the presence or absence of other caregivers may affect caregivers' behaviour and the time taken to receive a diagnosis of dementia. These findings indicate it may be beneficial to predict inhibiting factors and change approaches based on caregivers' and patients' background to promote early diagnosis.
Bibliography:Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest in this research.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1346-3500
1479-8301
1479-8301
DOI:10.1111/psyg.13075