Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms

Using a newly available dataset on the R&D investment of individual French manufacturing firms for the 1980s, we replicate and update a series of studies on French R&D and productivity at the firm level from the 1970s, and evaluate the robustness of methods currently used to measure the priv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of econometrics Vol. 65; no. 1; pp. 263 - 293
Main Authors Hall, Bronwyn H., Mairesse, Jacques
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 1995
Elsevier
North-Holland Pub. Co
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
SeriesJournal of Econometrics
Subjects
Applied economics
Applied sciences
Capital investments
Econometrics
Economic theory
Exact sciences and technology
Firm level
France
History
Inventory control, production control. Distribution
Manufacturers
Manufacturing
Operational research and scientific management
Operational research. Management science
Panel data
Production functions
Productivity
R&D
Research & development
Research & development expenditures
Research and development
Return on investment
Statistical analysis
France
Europe
Productivity
R&D
Firm level
Panel data
C23
L60
Manufacturing
O30
Production function
Research and development
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Using a newly available dataset on the R&D investment of individual French manufacturing firms for the 1980s, we replicate and update a series of studies on French R&D and productivity at the firm level from the 1970s, and evaluate the robustness of methods currently used to measure the private returns to R&D. Our main findings are: Having a longer history of R&D expenditures helps improve the quality of the R&D elasticity estimates, but the choice of depreciation rate for R&D capital makes little difference. The correction for double-counting of R&D expenditures in capital and labor is important and may be interpreted under certain conditions as converting a measured ‘excess’ rate of return to a total rate of return to R&D. We show that the direct production function approach to measure returns to R&D capital is preferred on several grounds over the rate of return variation used in the past. Finally, as in the 1970s, the productivity of R&D capital for French manufacturing firms in the 1980s is positive; how strong and robust depends on whether we control for potential industry and firm effects.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0304-4076
1872-6895
DOI:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01604-X