MET Inhibitors Promote Liver Tumor Evasion of the Immune Response by Stabilizing PDL1

Inhibitors of MET have not produced satisfactory outcomes in trials of patients with liver cancer. We investigated the mechanisms of liver tumor resistance to MET inhibitors in mice. We tested the effects of MET inhibitors tivantinib and capmatinib in the mouse hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell li...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943) Vol. 156; no. 6; pp. 1849 - 1861.e13
Main Authors Li, Hui, Li, Chia-Wei, Li, Xiaoqiang, Ding, Qingqing, Guo, Lei, Liu, Shuang, Liu, Chunxiao, Lai, Chien-Chen, Hsu, Jung-Mao, Dong, Qiongzhu, Xia, Weiya, Hsu, Jennifer L., Yamaguchi, Hirohito, Du, Yi, Lai, Yun-Ju, Sun, Xian, Koller, Paul B., Ye, Qinghai, Hung, Mien-Chie
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.05.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Inhibitors of MET have not produced satisfactory outcomes in trials of patients with liver cancer. We investigated the mechanisms of liver tumor resistance to MET inhibitors in mice. We tested the effects of MET inhibitors tivantinib and capmatinib in the mouse hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell line HCA-1 and in immune-competent and immunodeficient mice with subcutaneous tumors grown from this cell line. Tumors were collected from mice and tumor cells were analyzed by time-of-flight mass cytometry. We used short hairpin RNAs to weaken expression of MET in Hep3B, SK-HEP-1, HA59T, and HA22T liver cancer cell lines and analyzed cells by immunoblot, immunofluorescence, and immunoprecipitation assays. Mass spectrometry was used to assess interactions between MET and glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3B), and GSK3B phosphorylation, in liver cancer cell lines. C57/BL6 mice with orthotopic tumors grown from Hep1-6 cells were given combinations of capmatinib or tivantinib and antibodies against programmed cell death 1 (PDCD1; also called PD1); tumors were collected and analyzed by immunofluorescence. We analyzed 268 HCCsamples in a tissue microarray by immunohistochemistry. Exposure of liver cancer cell lines to MET inhibitors increased their expression of PD ligand 1 (PDL1) and inactivated cocultured T cells. MET phosphorylated and activated GSK3B at tyrosine 56, which decreased the expression of PDL1 by liver cancer cells. In orthotopic tumors grown in immune-competent mice, MET inhibitors decreased the antitumor activity of T cells. However, addition of anti-PD1 decreased orthotopic tumor growth and prolonged survival of mice compared with anti-PD1 or MET inhibitors alone. Tissue microarray analysis of HCC samples showed an inverse correlation between levels of MET and PDL1 and a positive correlation between levels of MET and phosphorylated GSK3B. In studies of liver cancer cell lines and mice with orthotopic tumors, MET mediated phosphorylation and activated GSK3B, leading to decreased expression of PDL1. Combined with a MET inhibitor, anti-PD1 and anti-PDL1 produced additive effect to slow growth of HCCs in mice.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Authors share co-first authorship.
Author contributions: Hui Li and Chia-Wei Li designed and performed the experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. Xiaoqiang Li, Qingqing Ding, Shuang Liu, Lei Guo, Chunxiao Liu, Chien-Chen Lai, Jung-Mao Hsu, Yun-Ju Lai, Xian Sun, Paul B. Koller, and Weiya Xia performed experiments and analyzed data. Qinghai Ye provided patient tissue samples. Qiongzhu Dong, Hirohito Yamaguchi, and Yi Du provided scientific input and critical cells. Jennifer L. Hsu revised the manuscript. Mien-Chie Hung supervised the entire project, designed the experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript.
Dr Yamaguchi’s present affiliation is: Cancer Research Center, Qatar Biomedical Research Institute, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar.
ISSN:0016-5085
1528-0012
1528-0012
DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.252