Rapid modulation of ultraviolet shielding in plants is influenced by solar ultraviolet radiation and linked to alterations in flavonoids

The accumulation of ultraviolet (UV)‐absorbing compounds (flavonoids and related phenylpropanoids) and the resultant decrease in epidermal UV transmittance (TUV) are primary protective mechanisms employed by plants against potentially damaging solar UV radiation and are critical components of the ov...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPlant, cell and environment Vol. 39; no. 1; pp. 222 - 230
Main Authors Barnes, Paul W, Tobler, Mark A, Keefover‐Ring, Ken, Flint, Stephan D, Barkley, Anne E, Ryel, Ronald J, Lindroth, Richard L
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Scientific Publications 01.01.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The accumulation of ultraviolet (UV)‐absorbing compounds (flavonoids and related phenylpropanoids) and the resultant decrease in epidermal UV transmittance (TUV) are primary protective mechanisms employed by plants against potentially damaging solar UV radiation and are critical components of the overall acclimation response of plants to changing solar UV environments. Whether plants can adjust this UV sunscreen protection in response to rapid changes in UV, as occurs on a diurnal basis, is largely unexplored. Here, we use a combination of approaches to demonstrate that plants can modulate their UV‐screening properties within minutes to hours, and these changes are driven, in part, by UV radiation. For the cultivated species Abelmoschus esculentus, large (30–50%) and reversible changes in TUV occurred on a diurnal basis, and these adjustments were associated with changes in the concentrations of whole‐leaf UV‐absorbing compounds and several quercetin glycosides. Similar results were found for two other species (Vicia faba and Solanum lycopersicum), but no such changes were detected in Zea mays. These findings reveal a much more dynamic UV‐protection mechanism than previously recognized, raise important questions concerning the costs and benefits of UV‐protection strategies in plants and have practical implications for employing UV to enhance crop vigor and quality in controlled environments.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pce.12609
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0140-7791
1365-3040
DOI:10.1111/pce.12609