Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study

• Published in: The lancet oncology Vol. 19; no. 2; pp. 169 - 180
• Main Authors: Copson, Ellen R, Maishman, Tom C, Tapper, Will J, Cutress, Ramsey I, Greville-Heygate, Stephanie, Altman, Douglas G, Eccles, Bryony, Gerty, Sue, Durcan, Lorraine T, Jones, Louise, Evans, D Gareth, Thompson, Alastair M, Pharoah, Paul, Easton, Douglas F, Dunning, Alison M, Hanby, Andrew, Lakhani, Sunil, Eeles, Ros, Gilbert, Fiona J, Hamed, Hisham, Hodgson, Shirley, Simmonds, Peter, Stanton, Louise, Eccles, Diana M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2018; Elsevier Limited; Lancet Pub. Group
• Subjects: Adult; Age Factors; Breast cancer; Breast Neoplasms - genetics; Breast Neoplasms - mortality; Breast Neoplasms - pathology; Breast Neoplasms - therapy; Cohort analysis; Cohort Studies; Combined Modality Therapy; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; Genetic Predisposition to Disease - epidemiology; Germ-Line Mutation - genetics; Health risk assessment; Humans; Medical prognosis; Multivariate Analysis; Mutation; Ovarian cancer; Pathology; Patient Outcome Assessment; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Studies; Survival Analysis; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms; United Kingdom; Womens health; Young Adult; United Kingdom; United Kingdom > UK
• ISSN: 1470-2045; 1474-5488
• DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30891-4

Retrospective studies provide conflicting interpretations of the effect of inherited genetic factors on the prognosis of patients with breast cancer. The primary aim of this study was to determine the effect of a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation on breast cancer outcomes in patients with young-onset breast cancer. We did a prospective cohort study of female patients recruited from 127 hospitals in the UK aged 40 years or younger at first diagnosis (by histological confirmation) of invasive breast cancer. Patients with a previous invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) were excluded. Patients were identified within 12 months of initial diagnosis. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were identified using blood DNA collected at recruitment. Clinicopathological data, and data regarding treatment and long-term outcomes, including date and site of disease recurrence, were collected from routine medical records at 6 months, 12 months, and then annually until death or loss to follow-up. The primary outcome was overall survival for all BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers (BRCA-positive) versus all non-carriers (BRCA-negative) at 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years after diagnosis. A prespecified subgroup analysis of overall survival was done in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Recruitment was completed in 2008, and long-term follow-up is continuing. Between Jan 24, 2000, and Jan 24, 2008, we recruited 2733 women. Genotyping detected a pathogenic BRCA mutation in 338 (12%) patients (201 with BRCA1, 137 with BRCA2). After a median follow-up of 8·2 years (IQR 6·0–9·9), 651 (96%) of 678 deaths were due to breast cancer. There was no significant difference in overall survival between BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative patients in multivariable analyses at any timepoint (at 2 years: 97·0% [95% CI 94·5–98·4] vs 96·6% [95·8–97·3]; at 5 years: 83·8% [79·3–87·5] vs 85·0% [83·5–86·4]; at 10 years: 73·4% [67·4–78·5] vs 70·1% [67·7–72·3]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·96 [95% CI 0·76–1·22]; p=0·76). Of 558 patients with triple-negative breast cancer, BRCA mutation carriers had better overall survival than non-carriers at 2 years (95% [95% CI 89–97] vs 91% [88–94]; HR 0·59 [95% CI 0·35–0·99]; p=0·047) but not 5 years (81% [73–87] vs 74% [70–78]; HR 1·13 [0·70–1·84]; p=0·62) or 10 years (72% [62–80] vs 69% [63–74]; HR 2·12 [0·82–5·49]; p= 0·12). Patients with young-onset breast cancer who carry a BRCA mutation have similar survival as non-carriers. However, BRCA mutation carriers with triple-negative breast cancer might have a survival advantage during the first few years after diagnosis compared with non-carriers. Decisions about timing of additional surgery aimed at reducing future second primary-cancer risks should take into account patient prognosis associated with the first malignancy and patient preferences. Cancer Research UK, the UK National Cancer Research Network, the Wessex Cancer Trust, Breast Cancer Now, and the PPP Healthcare Medical Trust Grant.