Feeding without teeth: the material properties of rhamphothecae from two species of durophagous sea turtles

The feeding apparatus of sea turtles comprises cornified keratinous rhamphothecae overlaying a bony rostrum. Although keratin is less stiff than the enamel of toothed animals, certain species of sea turtles are capable of withstanding large forces when feeding on hard prey. We aimed to quantify the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRoyal Society open science Vol. 10; no. 4; p. 221424
Main Authors Ingle, Danielle N, Perez, Eliza, Porter, Marianne E, Marshall, Christopher D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England The Royal Society 19.04.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The feeding apparatus of sea turtles comprises cornified keratinous rhamphothecae overlaying a bony rostrum. Although keratin is less stiff than the enamel of toothed animals, certain species of sea turtles are capable of withstanding large forces when feeding on hard prey. We aimed to quantify the mineral density, water content and compressive mechanical properties of rhamphothecae from two durophagous species: loggerhead ( ) and Kemp's ridley ( ) sea turtles. Since loggerheads theoretically produce the greater bite forces of these two species, we predicted that keratin from their rhamphothecae would have a greater mineral density and be stiffer, stronger and tougher compared with Kemp's ridley sea turtles. We found that total water weight of hydrated specimens (20%) was consistent between species. Rhamphotheca mineral density ranged between 0 and 0.069 g cm ; loggerheads had significantly greater mineral density compared with Kemp's ridleys, for which several specimens had no mineral detected. Despite the greater mineral density in loggerheads, we found no significant difference in Young's modulus, yield strength or toughness between these species. In addition to mineral density, our findings suggest that other material components, such as sulfur, may be influencing the material properties of keratin from sea turtle rhamphothecae.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6571651.
ISSN:2054-5703
2054-5703
DOI:10.1098/rsos.221424