Implicit learning of mappings between forms and metaphorical meanings

► People can implicitly acquire mappings between form and meaning. ► There was transfer of form-meaning connections from a concrete domain (height) to an abstract one (power). ► Metaphor-consistent transfer was achieved without awareness. Previous research has shown that people can implicitly acquir...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inConsciousness and cognition Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 174 - 183
Main Authors Li, Fengying, Guo, Xiuyan, Zhu, Lei, Yang, Zhiliang, Dienes, Zoltan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier Inc 01.03.2013
Elsevier
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:► People can implicitly acquire mappings between form and meaning. ► There was transfer of form-meaning connections from a concrete domain (height) to an abstract one (power). ► Metaphor-consistent transfer was achieved without awareness. Previous research has shown that people can implicitly acquire mappings between word forms and literal meanings (Williams, 2004, 2005). We argue, from the metaphor-representation and embodiment perspectives, that people can unconsciously establish mappings between word forms and not only literal but also metaphorical meanings. Using Williams’ (2005) paradigm, we found that transfer of form-meaning connections from a concrete domain (space) to an abstract domain (power) was achieved in a metaphor-consistent way without awareness. Our results support the view that unconscious knowledge can be flexibly deployed in an abstract way not previously explored in the implicit learning literature.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1053-8100
1090-2376
DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2012.11.011