Do parental attachment and prosocial behavior moderate the impairment from depression symptoms in adolescents who seek mental health care?

• Published in: Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health Vol. 17; no. 1; p. 133
• Main Authors: Hysaj, Marsida, Crone, Mathilde R, Kiefte-de Jong, Jessica C, Vermeiren, Robert R J M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 28.11.2023; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Adolescents; Agreements; Analysis; Attachment; Behavior; Caregivers; Child & adolescent mental health; Child & adolescent psychiatry; Child psychopathology; Children & youth; Clinical setting; Depressive symptoms; Evaluation; Families & family life; Fathers; Impairment from symptoms; Influence; Mental depression; Mental health care; Parental attachment; Parental behavior; Parenting; Parents & parenting; Peer relationships; Prosocial Behavior; Psychiatric services; Psychological aspects; Psychopathology; Social behavior; Strength-based approach; Teenagers; Youth; Netherlands; Prosocial Behavior; Strength-based approach; Depressive symptoms; Clinical setting; Parental attachment; Impairment from symptoms
• ISSN: 1753-2000; 1753-2000
• DOI: 10.1186/s13034-023-00680-1

We investigated parental attachment and prosocial behavior as social protective indicators in adolescents (age 11–17) with symptoms of depression in a clinical setting. Specifically, we tested the moderating effect of these factors on the relation between symptoms of depression and their impairment on daily life. The Development and Well-Being Assessment, as completed by children, mothers, and fathers, was used, and hierarchical multiple regression analyses were conducted for these three perspectives. From the adolescents’ reports, we only found a significant effect of symptoms on impairment, indicating that a higher number of symptoms were related to higher impairment. For the mothers and fathers, a higher score on the adolescents’ prosocial behavior was related to a lower impairment from depression symptoms on the daily life of the adolescent and the family. Only for the mothers did a higher score on prosocial behavior buffer the effect of symptoms on impairment, while a higher parental attachment score was associated with a lower impairment. Further, when examining maternal and paternal attachment separately, only the mothers reported less impairment when perceiving that the adolescent was attached to the father. Paternal attachment even buffered the effect of symptoms on impairment. To conclude, our results indicate that social protective factors, from the parent’s perspective, are likely to have a beneficial effect in clinical practice and should be taken into account when examining impairment scores. Future studies should investigate whether additional protective indicators from the adolescents’ perspective, such as quality of parental attachment or family climate, may have a positive impact on their daily functioning.