Clinical significance of R-wave amplitude in lead V 1 and inferobasal myocardial infarction in patients with inferior wall myocardial infarction
To assess electrocardiogram (ECG) for risk stratification in inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients within 24 h. Three hundred thirty-four patients were divided into four ECG-based groups: Group A: R V <0.3 mV with ST-segment elevation (ST↑) V -V , Group B: R V <0.3 mV wi...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology Vol. 29; no. 3; p. e13114 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.05.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To assess electrocardiogram (ECG) for risk stratification in inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients within 24 h.
Three hundred thirty-four patients were divided into four ECG-based groups: Group A: R V
<0.3 mV with ST-segment elevation (ST↑) V
-V
, Group B: R V
<0.3 mV without ST↑ V
-V
, Group C: R V
≥0.3 mV with ST↑ V
-V
, and Group D: R V
≥0.3 mV without ST↑ V
-V
.
Group A demonstrated the longest QRS duration, followed by Groups B, C, and D. ECG signs for right ventricle (RV) infarction were more common in Groups A and B (p < .01). ST elevation in V
, indicative of left ventricle (LV) lateral injury, was more higher in Group C than in Group A, while the ∑ST↑ V
R + V
R + V
R, representing RV infarction, showed the opposite trend (p < .05). The estimated LV infarct size from ECG was similar between Groups A and C, yet Group A had higher creatine kinase MB isoform (CK-MB; p < .05). Cardiac troponin I (cTNI) was higher in Groups A and C than in B and D (p < .05 and p = .16, respectively). NT-proBNP decreased across groups (p = .20), with the highest left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) observed in Group D (p < .05). Group A notably demonstrated more cardiac dysfunction within 4 h post-onset.
For inferior STEMI patients, concurrent R V
<0.3 mV with ST↑ V
-V
suggests prolonged ventricular activation and notable myocardial damage. RV infarction's dominance over LV lateral injury might explain these observations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1082-720X 1542-474X |
DOI: | 10.1111/anec.13114 |