Measuring the impact of information aggregation mechanisms: An experimental investigation

► We compare the effectiveness of market-based and cheap-talk information aggregation mechanisms (IAM). ► In a laboratory experiment, we study how information provided by IAMs interacts with private and public information and affect bidding behavior in a multi-unit common-value uniform-price auction...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of economic behavior & organization Vol. 78; no. 3; pp. 302 - 318
Main Authors Bennouri, Moez, Gimpel, Henner, Robert, Jacques
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.05.2011
Elsevier
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
SeriesJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:► We compare the effectiveness of market-based and cheap-talk information aggregation mechanisms (IAM). ► In a laboratory experiment, we study how information provided by IAMs interacts with private and public information and affect bidding behavior in a multi-unit common-value uniform-price auction. ► In market-based IAMs, information gathering prevails and subsequent bidding shows that subjects acknowledge the precision of information. ► In cheap-talk IAMs, there is almost no transmitted information. This paper measures the effectiveness of market-based and cheap-talk information aggregation. Both information aggregation mechanisms (IAMs) are frequently used prior to IPOs and sales of Treasury bonds – it is largely acknowledged that they provide agents with useful information for subsequent bidding. In a laboratory experiment, we study how information provided by IAMs interacts with private and public information and how agents integrate it in their strategic behavior in a multi-unit common-value uniform-price auction. In market-based IAMs, information gathering prevails and subsequent bidding shows that subjects acknowledge the precision of information. However, in cheap-talk IAMs, there is almost no transmitted information.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0167-2681
1879-1751
0167-2681
DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.01.016