Measuring the impact of information aggregation mechanisms: An experimental investigation
► We compare the effectiveness of market-based and cheap-talk information aggregation mechanisms (IAM). ► In a laboratory experiment, we study how information provided by IAMs interacts with private and public information and affect bidding behavior in a multi-unit common-value uniform-price auction...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of economic behavior & organization Vol. 78; no. 3; pp. 302 - 318 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
01.05.2011
Elsevier Elsevier Sequoia S.A |
Series | Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | ► We compare the effectiveness of market-based and cheap-talk information aggregation mechanisms (IAM). ► In a laboratory experiment, we study how information provided by IAMs interacts with private and public information and affect bidding behavior in a multi-unit common-value uniform-price auction. ► In market-based IAMs, information gathering prevails and subsequent bidding shows that subjects acknowledge the precision of information. ► In cheap-talk IAMs, there is almost no transmitted information.
This paper measures the effectiveness of market-based and cheap-talk information aggregation. Both information aggregation mechanisms (IAMs) are frequently used prior to IPOs and sales of Treasury bonds – it is largely acknowledged that they provide agents with useful information for subsequent bidding. In a laboratory experiment, we study how information provided by IAMs interacts with private and public information and how agents integrate it in their strategic behavior in a multi-unit common-value uniform-price auction. In market-based IAMs, information gathering prevails and subsequent bidding shows that subjects acknowledge the precision of information. However, in cheap-talk IAMs, there is almost no transmitted information. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0167-2681 1879-1751 0167-2681 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.01.016 |