Effect of secondary particle size of nickel oxide nanoparticles on cytotoxicity in A549 cells

The effect of nanoparticle type, shape, as well as primary and secondary particle size on toxicity remains poorly characterized. In this study, suspensions of nickel oxide (NiO) nanoparticles with the same primary particle size (< 50 nm) but different secondary particle sizes were prepared, and t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of toxicological sciences Vol. 47; no. 4; pp. 151 - 157
Main Authors Kawakami, Tsuyoshi, Miyajima, Atsuko, Komoriya, Kaoru, Kato, Reiko, Isama, Kazuo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Japanese Society of Toxicology 01.01.2022
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The effect of nanoparticle type, shape, as well as primary and secondary particle size on toxicity remains poorly characterized. In this study, suspensions of nickel oxide (NiO) nanoparticles with the same primary particle size (< 50 nm) but different secondary particle sizes were prepared, and their cytotoxicity was investigated. A planetary ball mill wet nanopulverizer with zirconium milling balls of decreasing sizes (φ: 0.5, 0.1, and 0.05 mm) yielded NiO nanoparticles of decreasing mean particle size (310.4 ± 6.7, 172.0 ± 2.8, and 102.0 ± 0.5 nm). Stock solutions were diluted to various concentrations in 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum containing minimum essential medium, and shown to have the same primary particle size, but different secondary particle sizes. Tests with A549 cells revealed that cytotoxicity increased with increasing secondary particle size: milling ball diameter φ 0.05 mm (IC50: 148 μg/mL) < φ 0.1 mm (IC50: 83.5 μg/mL) < φ 0.5 mm (IC50: 33.4 μg/mL). Uptake experiments indicated that the intracellular amount of Ni increased with increasing secondary particle size. In summary, the present findings show that differences in secondary particle size affected the cytotoxicity of NiO suspensions, which could be ascribed at least in part to differences in the amount of NiO taken up by the cells.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0388-1350
1880-3989
DOI:10.2131/jts.47.151