Do Centenarians Have Higher Levels of Depression? Findings from the Georgia Centenarian Study

Objectives To examine age differences on specific items and subscales of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Design Specific items, subscales, and total score on the GDS of three age groups were compared. Setting Community‐dwelling older adults. Participants One hundred thirty‐nine centenarians we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) Vol. 60; no. 2; pp. 238 - 242
Main Authors Scheetz, Laura T., Martin, Peter, Poon, Leonard W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, NJ Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2012
Wiley-Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives To examine age differences on specific items and subscales of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Design Specific items, subscales, and total score on the GDS of three age groups were compared. Setting Community‐dwelling older adults. Participants One hundred thirty‐nine centenarians were compared with 93 octogenarians and 91 sexagenarians. Measurements GDS scores. Results Results indicated age group differences in overall depression score and in withdrawal‐apathy‐vigor (WAV), cognitive impairment, and hopelessness subscale scores. Significant age group differences were also obtained for 12 of the 30 items. Centenarians rated higher on all subscales, but there was no difference in dysphoric mood and worry. Conclusion It is important to distinguish different dimensions of depression when assessing very old populations because some of the questions on the GDS are associated with fatigue, mild cognitive decline, and decline in physical functioning, which increase with aging. Future research should revisit the concept of depression in very late life.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-ZBKL2R2X-J
ArticleID:JGS3828
istex:4F72C33FDFE2E5752FD79072F45F980A148F1CBF
National Institute of Mental Health - No. RO1-MH43435
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-8614
1532-5415
DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03828.x