Fairness in interorganizational project relations: norms and strategies

There is a strong preference for fairness in human interaction, so that people who experience unfairness tend to react with anger, resentment and loss of motivation. Concerns to appear fair influence the behaviour of both individuals and firms. Perceptions of fairness are susceptible to framing and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inConstruction Management and Economics Vol. 23; no. 8; pp. 871 - 878
Main Author Kadefors, Anna
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Taylor & Francis 01.10.2005
Taylor and Francis Journals
E. & F.N. Spon
SeriesConstruction Management & Economics
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There is a strong preference for fairness in human interaction, so that people who experience unfairness tend to react with anger, resentment and loss of motivation. Concerns to appear fair influence the behaviour of both individuals and firms. Perceptions of fairness are susceptible to framing and may be influenced by various norms for outcome distribution as well as by decision processes and interpersonal relations. This paper deals with causes and effects of fairness perceptions in construction project relations, mainly fixed price contracts procured by competitive tendering. In such projects, uncertainty results in continuous post contract award problem-solving and negotiations, and fairness concerns may have incremental but significant influence on the terms of exchange. Case studies of client-contractor interaction in two projects are used to discuss of how fairness norms relate to strategies and industry culture. It is concluded that that an intuitive cost-based norm of fair pricing shapes interaction in construction projects, but that consequences vary between projects. The norm may favour contractors, but is also related to poor risk management and client distrust. To improve performance, clients need to design procurement practices and communication so that perceptions of contractor losses are counteracted.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0144-6193
1466-433X
1466-433X
1568-5551
DOI:10.1080/01446190500184238