A New Double Cuff Sphygmotonometer for Accurate Blood Pressure Measurement

Accurate measurement of blood pressure (BP) is essential in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension, but neither auscultatory nor oscillometric methods measure intra-arterial BP accurately in all circumstances. Algorithms for automatic BP-measuring devices differ from manufacturer to manufacture...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHypertension Research Vol. 24; no. 4; pp. 353 - 357
Main Authors TOCHIKUBO, Osamu, WATANABE, Junko, HANADA, Kouichi, MIYAJIMA, Eiji, KIMURA, Kazuo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England The Japanese Society of Hypertension 2001
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Accurate measurement of blood pressure (BP) is essential in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension, but neither auscultatory nor oscillometric methods measure intra-arterial BP accurately in all circumstances. Algorithms for automatic BP-measuring devices differ from manufacturer to manufacturer, and no clear authorized algorithm criteria have yet been established. We have devised a double-cuff sphygmotonometer to measure BP on the basis of clear algorithms, and investigated the accuracy of this new method by comparing it with the photo-oscillometric method, which is the most accurate method for non-invasive measurement of intra-arterial BP. In the new method, a small cuff (3×6 cm) replaces the photo-sensor in the brachial cuff (13×24 cm) of the photo-oscillometric device, and BP is determined by means of the oscillation within the small cuff. The comparison based on procedures of AAMI-protocol was performed in 136 hypertensive patients and 54 normotensive subjects. The difference in systolic BP between the photo-oscillometric and double-cuff methods was −2.26±2.31 mmHg (89% under 5 mmHg), and the corresponding difference in diastolic BP was 1.9±2.50 mmHg (94% under 5 mmHg). In conclusion, we have devised a new double-cuff method which improves on the photo-oscillometric method, and although it seems to be less accurate than the photo-oscillometric method, the clarity of its algorithm makes it superior to the conventional oscillometric and auscultatory methods employing only one cuff. (Hypertens Res 2001; 24: 353-357)
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0916-9636
1348-4214
DOI:10.1291/hypres.24.353