Building a new Rasch-based self-report inventory of depression

This paper illustrates a sequential item development process to create a new self-report instrument of depression refined with Rasch analysis from a larger pool of potential diagnostic items elicited through a consensus approach by clinical experts according to the latest edition of the Diagnostic a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment Vol. 10; pp. 153 - 165
Main Authors Balsamo, Michela, Giampaglia, Giuseppe, Saggino, Aristide
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New Zealand Dove Medical Press Limited 01.01.2014
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Dove Press
Dove Medical Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper illustrates a sequential item development process to create a new self-report instrument of depression refined with Rasch analysis from a larger pool of potential diagnostic items elicited through a consensus approach by clinical experts according to the latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria for major depression. A 51-item pool was administered to a sample of 529 subjects (300 healthy community-dwelling adults and 229 psychiatric outpatients). Item selection resulted in a 21-item set, named the Teate Depression Inventory, with an excellent Person Separation Index and no evidence of bias due to an item-trait interaction (χ (2)=147.71; df =168; P=0.48). Additional support for the unidimensionality, local independence, appropriateness of the response format, and discrimination ability between clinical and nonclinical subjects was provided. No substantial differential item functioning by sex was observed. The Teate Depression Inventory shows considerable promise as a unidimensional tool for the screening of depression. Finally, advantages and disadvantages of this methodology will be discussed in terms of subsequent possible mathematical analyses, statistical tests, and implications for clinical investigations.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1176-6328
1176-6328
1178-2021
DOI:10.2147/NDT.S53425