Centering Communities in Conservation through Asset-Based Quality of Life Planning

Healthy environments are fundamental to the quality of life of communities worldwide. Yet, many efforts to integrate environmental conservation with human well-being have struggled to center local people or failed to be flexible enough to accommodate a diversity of priorities. We present a methodolo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inConservation and society Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 48 - 60
Main Authors Campbell, Jacob, Jarrett, Christopher, Wali, Alaka, Rosenthal, Amy, Alvira, Diana, Lemos, Ana, Longoni, Mario, Winter, Alexis, Lopez, Lorena
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bangalore Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd 01.01.2023
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Healthy environments are fundamental to the quality of life of communities worldwide. Yet, many efforts to integrate environmental conservation with human well-being have struggled to center local people or failed to be flexible enough to accommodate a diversity of priorities. We present a methodology for community engagement known as Quality of Life (QoL) Planning—a form of rapid assessment, reflection, and consensus-building rooted in community assets. QoL Planning empowers communities to drive the conservation agenda and improve their well-being through conservation. In this paper, we provide an overview of the QoL Planning process and describe some of the positive outcomes it has generated. We compare four case studies from different regions—two in rural communities in Amazonian Peru and two in urban or peri-urban communities in the Chicago region in the United States—and assess some of the major lessons and insights. Lastly, we describe enabling conditions that contribute to the success of QoL Planning and identify important considerations for practitioners interested in implementing the methodology.
ISSN:0972-4923
0975-3133
DOI:10.4103/cs.cs_146_21