Differential Regulation of Lipoprotein Kinetics by Atorvastatin and Fenofibrate in Subjects With the Metabolic Syndrome
Differential Regulation of Lipoprotein Kinetics by Atorvastatin and Fenofibrate in Subjects With the Metabolic Syndrome Gerald F. Watts 1 , P. Hugh R. Barrett 1 , Juying Ji 1 , Adrian P. Serone 2 , Dick C. Chan 1 , Kevin D. Croft 1 , Franziska Loehrer 2 and Anthony G. Johnson 2 1 Lipoprotein Researc...
Saved in:
Published in | Diabetes (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 52; no. 3; pp. 803 - 811 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Alexandria, VA
American Diabetes Association
01.03.2003
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Differential Regulation of Lipoprotein Kinetics by Atorvastatin and Fenofibrate in Subjects With the Metabolic Syndrome
Gerald F. Watts 1 ,
P. Hugh R. Barrett 1 ,
Juying Ji 1 ,
Adrian P. Serone 2 ,
Dick C. Chan 1 ,
Kevin D. Croft 1 ,
Franziska Loehrer 2 and
Anthony G. Johnson 2
1 Lipoprotein Research Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Western Australia, the West Australian Institute for Medical
Research, Perth, Western Australia
2 James Lance GlaxoSmithKline Medicines Research Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
Abstract
The metabolic syndrome is characterized by insulin resistance and abnormal apolipoprotein AI (apoAI) and apolipoprotein B-100
(apoB) metabolism that may collectively accelerate atherosclerosis. The effects of atorvastatin (40 mg/day) and micronised
fenofibrate (200 mg/day) on the kinetics of apoAI and apoB were investigated in a controlled cross-over trial of 11 dyslipidemic
men with the metabolic syndrome. ApoAI and apoB kinetics were studied following intravenous d 3 -leucine administration using gas-chromatography mass spectrometry with data analyzed by compartmental modeling. Compared
with placebo, atorvastatin significantly decreased ( P < 0.001) plasma concentrations of cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL cholesterol, VLDL apoB, intermediate-density lipoprotein
(IDL) apoB, and LDL apoB. Fenofibrate significantly decreased ( P < 0.001) plasma triglyceride and VLDL apoB and elevated HDL 2 cholesterol ( P < 0.001), HDL 3 cholesterol ( P < 0.01), apoAI ( P = 0.01), and apoAII ( P < 0.001) concentrations, but it did not significantly alter LDL cholesterol. Atorvastatin significantly increased ( P < 0.002) the fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of VLDL apoB, IDL apoB, and LDL apoB but did not affect the production of apoB
in any lipoprotein fraction or in the turnover of apoAI. Fenofibrate significantly increased ( P < 0.01) the FCR of VLDL, IDL, and LDL apoB but did not affect the production of VLDL apoB. Relative to placebo and atorvastatin,
fenofibrate significantly increased the production ( P < 0.001) and FCR ( P = 0.016) of apoAI. Both agents significantly lowered plasma triglycerides and apoCIII concentrations, but only atorvastatin
significantly lowered ( P < 0.001) plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein activity. Neither treatment altered insulin resistance. In conclusion,
these differential effects of atorvastatin and fenofibrate on apoAI and apoB kinetics support the use of combination therapy
for optimally regulating dyslipoproteinemia in the metabolic syndrome.
Footnotes
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Associate Professor G.F. Watts, University Department of Medicine, Royal Perth
Hospital, Box X2213 GPO, Perth, WA 6847, Australia. E-mail: gfwatts{at}cyllene.uwa.edu.au
Received for publication 28 August 2002 and accepted in revised form 2 December 2002.
P.H.R.B. is a Career Development Fellow of the National Heart Foundation, and A.P.S., F.L., and A.G.J. are employees of GlaxoSmithKline.
apoAI, apolipoprotein AI; apoB, apolipoprotein B-100; CETP, cholesteryl ester transfer protein; FCR, fractional catabolic
rate; GCMS, gas chromatography; HOMA, homeostasis model assessment; HMG, hydroxymethylglutaryl; IDL, intermediate-density
lipoprotein; LCAT, lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor; PR, production
rate.
DIABETES |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0012-1797 1939-327X |
DOI: | 10.2337/diabetes.52.3.803 |