Intrinsic resting-state activity predicts working memory brain activation and behavioral performance

Although resting‐state brain activity has been demonstrated to correspond with task‐evoked brain activation, the relationship between intrinsic and evoked brain activity has not been fully characterized. For example, it is unclear whether intrinsic activity can also predict task‐evoked deactivation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman brain mapping Vol. 34; no. 12; pp. 3204 - 3215
Main Authors Zou, Qihong, Ross, Thomas J., Gu, Hong, Geng, Xiujuan, Zuo, Xi-Nian, Hong, L. Elliot, Gao, Jia-Hong, Stein, Elliot A., Zang, Yu-Feng, Yang, Yihong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2013
Wiley-Liss
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Although resting‐state brain activity has been demonstrated to correspond with task‐evoked brain activation, the relationship between intrinsic and evoked brain activity has not been fully characterized. For example, it is unclear whether intrinsic activity can also predict task‐evoked deactivation and whether the rest–task relationship is dependent on task load. In this study, we addressed these issues on 40 healthy control subjects using resting‐state and task‐driven [N‐back working memory (WM) task] functional magnetic resonance imaging data collected in the same session. Using amplitude of low‐frequency fluctuation (ALFF) as an index of intrinsic resting‐state activity, we found that ALFF in the middle frontal gyrus and inferior/superior parietal lobules was positively correlated with WM task‐evoked activation, while ALFF in the medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, superior frontal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, and fusiform gyrus was negatively correlated with WM task‐evoked deactivation. Further, the relationship between the intrinsic resting‐state activity and task‐evoked activation in lateral/superior frontal gyri, inferior/superior parietal lobules, superior temporal gyrus, and midline regions was stronger at higher WM task loads. In addition, both resting‐state activity and the task‐evoked activation in the superior parietal lobule/precuneus were significantly correlated with the WM task behavioral performance, explaining similar portions of intersubject performance variance. Together, these findings suggest that intrinsic resting‐state activity facilitates or is permissive of specific brain circuit engagement to perform a cognitive task, and that resting activity can predict subsequent task‐evoked brain responses and behavioral performance. Hum Brain Mapp 34:3204–3215, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-ZN7W85V8-B
istex:08AD989D6888F95D86C15E1428D1A9876B33A498
ArticleID:HBM22136
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Natural Science Foundation of China - No. 81020108022
China's National Strategic Basic Research Program (973) - No. 2012CB720700
Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1065-9471
1097-0193
1097-0193
DOI:10.1002/hbm.22136