Intermediation and (Mis-)Matching in Insurance Markets-Who Should Pay the Insurance Broker?

This article addresses the role of independent insurance intermediaries in markets where matching is important. We compare fee-based and commission-based compensation systems and show that they are payoff equivalent if the intermediary is completely honest. Allowing for strategic behavior, we discus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of risk and insurance Vol. 80; no. 2; pp. 329 - 350
Main Authors Focht, Uwe, Richter, Andreas, Schiller, Jörg
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.06.2013
Wiley Periodicals, Inc
American Risk and Insurance Association, Inc
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This article addresses the role of independent insurance intermediaries in markets where matching is important. We compare fee-based and commission-based compensation systems and show that they are payoff equivalent if the intermediary is completely honest. Allowing for strategic behavior, we discuss the impact of remuneration on the quality of advice. The possibility of mismatching gives the intermediary substantial market power, which will not translate into mismatching if consumers are rational. Furthermore, we offer a rationale for the use of contingent commissions and address whether or not the ban of any commission payments is an appropriate market intervention.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-XPZ3W25P-3
ArticleID:JORI1475
istex:4DE33ABB537BF9AAE5DC8C141982FC0CADE3A5E7
ISSN:0022-4367
1539-6975
DOI:10.1111/j.1539-6975.2012.01475.x