Intermediation and (Mis-)Matching in Insurance Markets-Who Should Pay the Insurance Broker?
This article addresses the role of independent insurance intermediaries in markets where matching is important. We compare fee-based and commission-based compensation systems and show that they are payoff equivalent if the intermediary is completely honest. Allowing for strategic behavior, we discus...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of risk and insurance Vol. 80; no. 2; pp. 329 - 350 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Malden, USA
Blackwell Publishing Inc
01.06.2013
Wiley Periodicals, Inc American Risk and Insurance Association, Inc Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This article addresses the role of independent insurance intermediaries in markets where matching is important. We compare fee-based and commission-based compensation systems and show that they are payoff equivalent if the intermediary is completely honest. Allowing for strategic behavior, we discuss the impact of remuneration on the quality of advice. The possibility of mismatching gives the intermediary substantial market power, which will not translate into mismatching if consumers are rational. Furthermore, we offer a rationale for the use of contingent commissions and address whether or not the ban of any commission payments is an appropriate market intervention. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-XPZ3W25P-3 ArticleID:JORI1475 istex:4DE33ABB537BF9AAE5DC8C141982FC0CADE3A5E7 |
ISSN: | 0022-4367 1539-6975 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1539-6975.2012.01475.x |