Conflicting Reports Regarding the Histopathological Features of Androgenic Alopecia: Are Biopsy Location, Hair Diameter Diversity, and Relative Hair Follicle Miniaturization Partly to Blame?

Despite decades of study, debate persists over the role of inflammation, fibrosis, and prostaglandins in the histopathology of androgenic alopecia (AGA). This brief review proposes that inconsistent findings across histological studies are a consequence of three inadequately controlled variables: 1)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology Vol. 14; pp. 357 - 365
Main Authors English, Robert, Ruiz, Sophia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New Zealand Dove Medical Press Limited 01.01.2021
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Dove
Dove Medical Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Despite decades of study, debate persists over the role of inflammation, fibrosis, and prostaglandins in the histopathology of androgenic alopecia (AGA). This brief review proposes that inconsistent findings across histological studies are a consequence of three inadequately controlled variables: 1) biopsy location, 2) hair diameter diversity (HDD), and 3) relative hair follicle miniaturization (HFM) within and across subjects. We suggest new methodological considerations to improve AGA histopathological research, as well as a novel classification system to quantify HFM by its stages. Finally, we hypothesize a dynamic relationship between inflammation, fibrosis, and prostaglandin activity dependent on relative HFM.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1178-7015
1178-7015
DOI:10.2147/CCID.S306157