Bioactive Restorative Materials Applied over Coronal Dentine-A Bibliometric and Critical Review

• Published in: Bioengineering (Basel) Vol. 10; no. 6; p. 731
• Main Authors: Pires, Paula Maciel, Rosa, Thamirys da Costa, Ribeiro-Lages, Mariana Batista, Duarte, Maysa Lannes, Cople Maia, Lucianne, Neves, Aline de Almeida, Sauro, Salvatore
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01.06.2023; MDPI
• Subjects: Adhesives; Bibliometrics; Biocompatibility; Bioengineering; Biological activity; Biomedical materials; Biomimetic materials; Bonding strength; Cement; dental material; Dental materials; Dentin; dentistry; Keywords; Libraries; Properties; Review; Smart materials; Substrates; Brazil; dental material; dentin; smart materials; dentistry; tooth demineralization; bibliometrics
• ISSN: 2306-5354; 2306-5354
• DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10060731

The objective of the research was to examine the scientific literature concerning restorative materials with bioactive properties for the purpose of covering dentin. Searches were performed in various databases including MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Lilacs/BBO, and Embase. Inclusion criteria involved studies that utilized the terms "dentin" and "bioactive", along with "ion-releasing", "smart materials", "biomimetic materials" and "smart replacement for dentin". The information extracted included the title, authors, publication year, journal and the country of affiliation of the corresponding author. The studies were categorized based on their study design, type of material, substrate, analytical method, and bioactivity. A total of 7161 records were recovered and 159 were included for data extraction. Most of the publications were in vitro studies ( = 149), testing different types of materials in sound dentine ( = 115). Most studies were published in ( = 29), and an increase in publications could be observed after the year 2000. Most of the articles were from the USA ( = 34), followed by Brazil ( = 28). Interfacial analysis was the most investigated ( = 105), followed by bond strength ( = 86). Bioactivity potential was demonstrated for most tested materials ( = 148). This review presents insights into the current trends of bioactive materials development, clearly showing a severe lack of clinical studies.