Systemic inflammatory response markers in preeclampsia

ABSTRACT PURPOSE: Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), platelet distribution width (PDW), red cell distribution width (RDW), mean platelet volume (MPV), and plateletcrit (PCT) are known as systemic inflammatory response markers. In this study, we aimed to evaluate chan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of laboratory physicians Vol. 10; no. 3; pp. 316 - 319
Main Authors Çintesun, Ersin, Çintesun, Feyza Nur Incesu, Ezveci, Huriye, Akyürek, Fikret, Çelik, Çetin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd 01.07.2018
Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd
Thieme Medical Publishers Inc
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT PURPOSE: Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), platelet distribution width (PDW), red cell distribution width (RDW), mean platelet volume (MPV), and plateletcrit (PCT) are known as systemic inflammatory response markers. In this study, we aimed to evaluate changes in NLR, PLR, PDW, RDW, MPV, and PCT in preeclampsia (PE) and their use in predicting its severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective case–control study. The study comprised 64 control group (healthy pregnant females), 51 females with mild PE, and 13 with severe PE. These three groups were compared with demographic data and inflammation markers. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between healthy pregnant females and preeclaptic females in terms of median age, hemoglobin, lymphocyte, neutrophil, platelet, NLR, PLR, PDV, RDW, MPV, PCT ( P > 0.05). The control group has a higher number of gravity and parity than the PE group ( P < 0.001). MPV value is a lower PE group than the control group ( P < 0.001). Both gravity and parity were significantly higher in the patients with mild PE than in the control group ( P < 0.001). MPV value was statistically higher in the control group compared both mild and severe PE ( P < 0.001), however, no statistical difference between mild and severe PE ( P = 0.305). CONCLUSIONS: MPV may be clinically useful markers in the prediction of PE. Further, prospective multicenter studies are needed to reveal the association between these markers and PE.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0974-2727
0974-7826
DOI:10.4103/JLP.JLP_144_17