Neural substrates of tactile object recognition: An fMRI study

A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study was conducted during which seven subjects carried out naturalistic tactile object recognition (TOR) of real objects. Activation maps, conjunctions across subjects, were compared between tasks involving TOR of common real objects, palpation of “non...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman brain mapping Vol. 21; no. 4; pp. 236 - 246
Main Authors Reed, Catherine L., Shoham, Shy, Halgren, Eric
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.04.2004
Wiley-Liss
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1065-9471
1097-0193
DOI10.1002/hbm.10162

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study was conducted during which seven subjects carried out naturalistic tactile object recognition (TOR) of real objects. Activation maps, conjunctions across subjects, were compared between tasks involving TOR of common real objects, palpation of “nonsense” objects, and rest. The tactile tasks involved similar motor and sensory stimulation, allowing higher tactile recognition processes to be isolated. Compared to nonsense object palpation, the most prominent activation evoked by TOR was in secondary somatosensory areas in the parietal operculum (SII) and insula, confirming a modality‐specific path for TOR. Prominent activation was also present in medial and lateral secondary motor cortices, but not in primary motor areas, supporting the high level of sensory and motor integration characteristic of object recognition in the tactile modality. Activation in a lateral occipitotemporal area associated previously with visual object recognition may support cross‐modal collateral activation. Finally, activation in medial temporal and prefrontal areas may reflect a common final pathway of modality‐independent object recognition. This study suggests that TOR involves a complex network including parietal and insular somatosensory association cortices, as well as occipitotemporal visual areas, prefrontal, and medial temporal supramodal areas, and medial and lateral secondary motor cortices. It confirms the involvement of somatosensory association areas in the recognition component of TOR, and the existence of a ventrolateral somatosensory pathway for TOR in intact subjects. It challenges the results of previous studies that emphasize the role of visual cortex rather than somatosensory association cortices in higher‐level somatosensory cognition. Hum. Brain Mapping 21:236–246, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-CTFTWS1X-8
ArticleID:HBM10162
istex:8D293E47DED9087E1580BDF7077B9C58580F5BF8
USPHS - No. NS18741
NSF - No. IBN-9805999
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1065-9471
1097-0193
DOI:10.1002/hbm.10162