State-dependent effectiveness of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on cortical excitability

• Published in: NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Vol. 277; p. 120242
• Main Authors: Vergallito, Alessandra, Varoli, Erica, Pisoni, Alberto, Mattavelli, Giulia, Del Mauro, Lilia, Feroldi, Sarah, Vallar, Giuseppe, Romero Lauro, Leonor J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 15.08.2023; Elsevier Limited; Elsevier
• Subjects: Behavior; Brain research; Cathodal tDCS; Cortex (parietal); EEG; Electroencephalography; Excitability; Factorial experiments; Magnetic fields; Memory; Mental task performance; Physiology; Short term memory; Spatial memory; State-dependency; tDCS; TMS-EEG; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; State-dependency; TMS-EEG; tDCS; Cathodal tDCS
• ISSN: 1053-8119; 1095-9572; 1095-9572
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120242

•Cathodal vs. sham tDCS decreases performance in a visuospatial attentional task.•Cathodal compared to sham tDCS decreases brain excitability during task performance.•Cathodal tDCS effects change in rest state vs. during cognitive activity.•We provide clear-cut evidence that cathodal tDCS effects are state dependent. The extensive use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in experimental and clinical settings does not correspond to an in-depth understanding of its underlying neurophysiological mechanisms. In previous studies, we employed an integrated system of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) to track the effect of tDCS on cortical excitability. At rest, anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) over the right Posterior Parietal Cortex (rPPC) elicits a widespread increase in cortical excitability. In contrast, cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) fails to modulate cortical excitability, being indistinguishable from sham stimulation. Here we investigated whether an endogenous task-induced activation during stimulation might change this pattern, improving c-tDCS effectiveness in modulating cortical excitability. In Experiment 1, we tested whether performance in a Visuospatial Working Memory Task (VWMT) and a modified Posner Cueing Task (mPCT), involving rPPC, could be modulated by c-tDCS. Thirty-eight participants were involved in a two-session experiment receiving either c-tDCS or sham during tasks execution. In Experiment 2, we recruited sixteen novel participants who performed the same paradigm but underwent TMS-EEG recordings pre- and 10 min post- sham stimulation and c-tDCS. Behavioral results showed that c-tDCS significantly modulated mPCT performance compared to sham. At a neurophysiological level, c-tDCS significantly reduced cortical excitability in a frontoparietal network likely involved in task execution. Taken together, our results provide evidence of the state dependence of c-tDCS in modulating cortical excitability effectively. The conceptual and applicative implications are discussed.