Endemic infection reduces transmission potential of an epidemic parasite during co-infection

Endemic, low-virulence parasitic infections are common in nature. Such infections may deplete host resources, which in turn could affect the reproduction of other parasites during co-infection. We aimed to determine whether the reproduction, and therefore transmission potential, of an epidemic paras...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Vol. 280; no. 1769; p. 20131500
Main Authors Randall, J., Cable, J., Guschina, I. A., Harwood, J. L., Lello, J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England The Royal Society 22.10.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Endemic, low-virulence parasitic infections are common in nature. Such infections may deplete host resources, which in turn could affect the reproduction of other parasites during co-infection. We aimed to determine whether the reproduction, and therefore transmission potential, of an epidemic parasite was limited by energy costs imposed on the host by an endemic infection. Total lipids, triacylglycerols (TAG) and polar lipids were measured in cockroaches (Blattella germanica) that were fed ad libitum, starved or infected with an endemic parasite, Gregarina blattarum. Reproductive output of an epidemic parasite, Steinernema carpocapsae, was then assessed by counting the number of infective stages emerging from these three host groups. We found both starvation and gregarine infection reduced cockroach lipids, mainly through depletion of TAG. Further, both starvation and G. blattarum infection resulted in reduced emergence of nematode transmission stages. This is, to our knowledge, the first study to demonstrate directly that host resource depletion caused by endemic infection could affect epidemic disease transmission. In view of the ubiquity of endemic infections in nature, future studies of epidemic transmission should take greater account of endemic co-infections.
Bibliography:ArticleID:rspb20131500
href:rspb20131500.pdf
istex:7D992A0F4B2E3A6E86333BA2B491129F93CAD351
ark:/67375/V84-Z70S90VM-J
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0962-8452
1471-2945
1471-2954
DOI:10.1098/rspb.2013.1500