Women at altitude: energy requirement at 4,300 m
1 Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Palo Alto 94304; 2 Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305; 3 United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts 01460; 4 University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262; and 5 University of...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of applied physiology (1985) Vol. 88; no. 1; pp. 272 - 281 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Bethesda, MD
Am Physiological Soc
01.01.2000
American Physiological Society |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | 1 Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care System,
Palo Alto 94304; 2 Stanford
University, Stanford, California 94305; 3 United
States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick,
Massachusetts 01460; 4 University of Colorado
Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262; and
5 University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309
To test the
hypotheses that prolonged exposure to moderately high altitude
increases the energy requirement of adequately fed women and that the
sole cause of the increase is an elevation in basal metabolic rate
(BMR), we studied 16 healthy women [21.7 ± 0.5 (SD) yr; 167.4 ± 1.1 cm; 62.2 ± 1.0 kg]. Studies were conducted over 12 days at sea level (SL) and at 4,300 m [high altitude
(HA)]. To test that menstrual cycle phase has an effect on
energetics at HA, we monitored menstrual cycle in all women, and most
women ( n = 11) were studied in the same phase at SL and HA.
Daily energy intake at HA was increased to respond to increases in BMR
and to maintain body weight and body composition. Mean BMR for the group rose 6.9% above SL by day 3 at HA and fell to SL values by day 6. Total energy requirement remained elevated 6% at HA [~670 kJ/day (160 kcal/day) above that at SL], but the
small and transient increase in BMR could not explain all of this
increase, giving rise to an apparent "energy requirement excess."
The transient nature of the rise in BMR may have been due to the
fitness level of the subjects. The response to altitude was not
affected by menstrual cycle phase. The energy requirement excess is at
present unexplained.
basal metabolic rate; nitrogen balance; acclimatization; menstrual
cycle; controlled diet; energy balance; weight control |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 8750-7587 1522-1601 |
DOI: | 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.1.272 |