Child Abuse as a Predictor of Gendered Sexual Orientation Disparities in Body Mass Index Trajectories Among U.S. Youth From the Growing Up Today Study

Abstract Purpose This research aimed to explain sexual orientation disparities in body mass index (BMI) by examining child abuse history, weight-related behaviors, and sociodemographics. Methods We used data from 7,960 females and 5,992 males from the prospective Growing Up Today Study over nine wav...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of adolescent health Vol. 54; no. 6; pp. 730 - 738
Main Authors Katz-Wise, Sabra L., Ph.D, Jun, Hee-Jin, Sc.D, Corliss, Heather L., M.P.H., Ph.D, Jackson, Benita, Ph.D., M.P.H, Haines, Jess, Ph.D., R.D, Austin, S. Bryn, Sc.D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.06.2014
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Purpose This research aimed to explain sexual orientation disparities in body mass index (BMI) by examining child abuse history, weight-related behaviors, and sociodemographics. Methods We used data from 7,960 females and 5,992 males from the prospective Growing Up Today Study over nine waves between 1996 (ages 12–14 years) and 2007 (ages 20–25 years). Using repeated measures of BMI (kg/m2 ) as a continuous outcome, gender-stratified latent quadratic growth models adjusted for child abuse history, weight-related behaviors, and sociodemographics. BMI at age 17 years (intercept) and 1-year change in BMI (slope) are reported. Results Bisexual females had higher BMI at age 17 years (β = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.00–2.18) and displayed greater one-year increases in BMI (β = .09, 95% CI = .03–.14), compared with completely heterosexual females. Gay males displayed smaller 1-year increases in BMI (β = −.19, 95% CI = −.25 to −.12), compared with completely heterosexual males. No sexual orientation differences in BMI at age 17 years were observed for males, but gay males' BMI at age 25 was less than completely heterosexual males' BMI by 2 units. Among females, sexual orientation differences remained but were slightly attenuated after controlling for child abuse history, weight-related behaviors, and sociodemographics. Among males, the addition of child abuse and weight-related behaviors did not change the estimated difference in 1-year BMI increases. Conclusions Sexual orientation differences in BMI were partly explained by child abuse and weight-related behaviors in females. More research is needed to explore additional drivers of these disparities among both females and males.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1054-139X
1879-1972
DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.006