Excess body fat negatively affects bone mass in adolescents

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of excess body fat on bone mass in overweight, obese, and extremely obese adolescents. Methods This study included 377 adolescents of both sexes, ages 10 to 19 y. Weight, height, body mass index (BMI), bone age, bone mineral con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) Vol. 30; no. 7; pp. 847 - 852
Main Authors Mosca, Luciana Nunes, M.Sc, Goldberg, Tamara Beres Lederer, M.D., Ph.D, da Silva, Valéria Nóbrega, M.Sc, da Silva, Carla Cristiane, M.Sc, Kurokawa, Cilmery Suemi, M.Sc., Ph.D, Bisi Rizzo, Anapaula C., M.Sc, Corrente, José Eduardo, Ph.D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.07.2014
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of excess body fat on bone mass in overweight, obese, and extremely obese adolescents. Methods This study included 377 adolescents of both sexes, ages 10 to 19 y. Weight, height, body mass index (BMI), bone age, bone mineral content (BMC), and bone mineral density (BMD) were obtained by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. The results were adjusted for chronological age and bone age. Comparisons according to nutritional classification were performed by analysis of variance, followed by Tukey test. Linear regression models were used to explain the variation in BMD and BMC in the L1–L4 lumbar spinal region, proximal femur, and whole body in relation to BMI, lean mass, fat mass (FM), and body fat percentage (BF%), considering P < 0.05. Results For all nutritional groups, average bone age was higher than chronological age. In both sexes, weight and BMI values increased from eutrophic to extremely obese groups, except for BMD and BMC, which did not differ among male adolescents, and were smaller in extremely obese than in obese female adolescents ( P < 0.01). Significant differences were observed for FM and BF% values among all nutritional groups ( P < 0.01). Positive, moderate to strong correlations were detected between BMD and BMC for BMI, lean mass, and FM. A negative and moderate correlation was found between BMC and BF%, and between BMD and BF% at all bone sites analyzed in males and between BF% and spine and femur BMD, in females. Conclusion The results reveal a negative effect of BF% on bone mass in males and indicate that the higher the BF% among overweight adolescents, the lower the BMD and BMC values.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0899-9007
1873-1244
DOI:10.1016/j.nut.2013.12.003