A comparison of family care infrastructure for demented elderly in inner cities and regional areas in Japan

Background:  Family members' observations of daily life are important for the diagnosis and treatment of dementia. However, elderly people are increasingly living alone, and family structures tend to differ between inner‐city areas and regional areas. We aimed to compare the family caregiving i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychogeriatrics Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 159 - 164
Main Authors SHINAGAWA, Shunichiro, YATABE, Yusuke, HASHIMOTO, Mamoru, NAKAYAMA, Kazuhiko, IKEDA, Manabu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Melbourne, Australia Blackwell Publishing Asia 01.09.2012
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background:  Family members' observations of daily life are important for the diagnosis and treatment of dementia. However, elderly people are increasingly living alone, and family structures tend to differ between inner‐city areas and regional areas. We aimed to compare the family caregiving infrastructure of demented elderly visiting a memory clinic. Methods:  Subjects were consecutive outpatients with dementia at the memory clinic at a university hospital in two different areas. We compared subjects' demographic data, residency status, housemates and companion status at the time of their initial visit. Results:  Patients in the inner‐city area (n= 99) had more education and higher Mini‐Mental State Examination scores than those in the regional area (n= 172). In both areas, the highest proportion of patients lived with their spouse. In the inner city, patients' housemates were either their spouse (34%) or their child (13%); 22% lived alone. In regional areas, patients lived with their spouse only (39%) or in their child's household (23%); 14% lived alone. At their initial consultation, inner‐city patients were accompanied by a family member other than their spouse (49%), a spouse (27%), or they were alone (7%). In the regional area, patients' companions were their spouse (35%) or their spouse and other family members (18%); patients rarely arrived alone. Regression analysis showed that education, diagnosis, housemate state (child only), and companion state (alone) significantly influenced the living area. Conclusion:  Our results suggest family caregiving infrastructure of demented elderly differ between the two areas. This may reflect changes in social structure and increased awareness regarding dementia in inner‐city areas.
Bibliography:istex:E7045F1D6EA913367ED208755BF3AC79ED42FB5D
ArticleID:PSYG395
ark:/67375/WNG-C47X82PT-5
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1346-3500
1479-8301
DOI:10.1111/j.1479-8301.2011.00395.x