Cry Wolf!: Narratives of Wolf Recovery in France and Norway

Due to strict protection through the last decades, wolves have returned to many areas from which they have been absent for a long time. This is a conservation success story, but the wolves also cause conflicts wherever they arrive. We have studied the situation in southeastern Norway and in the Fren...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRural sociology Vol. 73; no. 1; pp. 105 - 133
Main Authors Skogen, K, Mauz, I, Krange, O
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2008
Rural Sociological Society
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Due to strict protection through the last decades, wolves have returned to many areas from which they have been absent for a long time. This is a conservation success story, but the wolves also cause conflicts wherever they arrive. We have studied the situation in southeastern Norway and in the French Alps, where the conflict patterns are similar. Diverging interpretations of the situation are supported by narratives, and two varieties have become increasingly significant in both countries. Rumors about the secret reintroduction of wolves are common among wolf adversaries. Another narrative, important to the pro-wolf camp, is based on the notion that particular sheep husbandry practices (unattended rough grazing) are unique to either Norway or France--whereas there are in fact more similarities than differences. Yet, while the reintroduction-conspiracy rumors are ridiculed, the notion of unique national conflict patterns has achieved a status almost of official truth. Furthermore, the story about natural wolf recovery is itself a value-laden narrative, and not only ''scientific fact.'' The different status of these narratives tell us something about power relations: Given their different social basis, it seems relevant to consider the national uniqueness image and the natural recovery theory as tightly interwoven with symbolic power and the reintroduction conspiracy rumors as similarly interwoven with patterns of cultural resistance.
Bibliography:Acknowledgments: The Norwegian research was funded by grants from the Research Council of Norway and from the Directorate for Nature Management. The French research was funded by Cemagref. Correspondence should be directed to the first author at NINA, Gaustadalleen 21, N-0349 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: ketil.skogen@nina.no
ArticleID:RUSO282
ark:/67375/WNG-WRJB432C-5
istex:EDE1CDDB639F3CC3E8E7B7BA0779EE17C8C4C5C8
Acknowledgments: The Norwegian research was funded by grants from the Research Council of Norway and from the Directorate for Nature Management. The French research was funded by Cemagref. Correspondence should be directed to the first author at NINA, Gaustadalleen 21, N‐0349 Oslo, Norway. E‐mail
ketil.skogen@nina.no
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0036-0112
1549-0831
DOI:10.1526/003601108783575916