Competition and screening with motivated health professionals

•A for-profit and a non-profit hospital compete to hire health professionals.•Workers are privately informed about their ability and motivation.•Sorting of workers to hospitals is efficient and ability-neutral.•Allocative distortions are decreasing in the degree of competition.•Motivated workers ten...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of health economics Vol. 50; pp. 358 - 371
Main Authors Barigozzi, Francesca, Burani, Nadia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.12.2016
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•A for-profit and a non-profit hospital compete to hire health professionals.•Workers are privately informed about their ability and motivation.•Sorting of workers to hospitals is efficient and ability-neutral.•Allocative distortions are decreasing in the degree of competition.•Motivated workers tend to provide a higher amount of care and are paid less. Two hospitals compete for the exclusive services of health professionals, who are privately informed about their ability and motivation. Hospitals differ in their ownership structure and in the mission they pursue. The non-profit hospital sacrifices some profits to follow its mission but becomes attractive for motivated workers. In equilibrium, when both hospitals are active, the sorting of workers to hospitals is efficient and ability-neutral. Allocative distortions are decreasing in the degree of competition and disappear when hospitals are similar. The non-profit hospital tends to provide a higher amount of care and offer lower salaries than the for-profit one.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-6296
1879-1646
DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.06.003