Comparative Efficacy of Inactivated and Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccines

Data are scarce regarding the comparative efficacies of the inactivated (intramuscular administration) and live attenuated (intranasal administration) seasonal influenza vaccines. During the 2007–2008 influenza season, 1952 healthy young adults were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe New England journal of medicine Vol. 361; no. 13; pp. 1260 - 1267
Main Authors Monto, Arnold S, Ohmit, Suzanne E, Petrie, Joshua G, Johnson, Emileigh, Truscon, Rachel, Teich, Esther, Rotthoff, Judy, Boulton, Matthew, Victor, John C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Waltham, MA Massachusetts Medical Society 24.09.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Data are scarce regarding the comparative efficacies of the inactivated (intramuscular administration) and live attenuated (intranasal administration) seasonal influenza vaccines. During the 2007–2008 influenza season, 1952 healthy young adults were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of these two vaccines. The inactivated vaccine was found to have an absolute efficacy of 68%, whereas the live attenuated vaccine had an absolute efficacy of 36%. The inactivated (intramuscular administration) vaccine was found to have an absolute efficacy of 68%, whereas the live attenuated (intranasal administration) vaccine had an absolute efficacy of 36%. Two different types of vaccine for the prevention of seasonal influenza are currently licensed, one containing inactivated viruses and the other containing live attenuated viruses. Both vaccines are trivalent, with the three components updated annually as needed on the basis of national and international recommendations. 1 The efficacy of both vaccines can be affected by a number of factors, including the age and health of the vaccine recipients, and by the extent of antigenic similarity between the strains included in the vaccines and those that actually circulate months later. 2 – 6 Thus, there can be differences in efficacy from year to year. . . .
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-General Information-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-3
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa0808652