Toxicity-reduced, myeloablative allograft followed by lenalidomide maintenance as salvage therapy for refractory/relapsed myeloma patients
Relapse after dose-reduced allograft in advanced myeloma patients remains high. To reduce the risk of relapse, we investigated a myeloablative toxicity-reduced allograft (aSCT) consisting of i.v. BU and CY followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy in 33 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who rel...
Saved in:
Published in | Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke) Vol. 48; no. 3; pp. 403 - 407 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Basingstoke
Nature Publishing Group
01.03.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Relapse after dose-reduced allograft in advanced myeloma patients remains high. To reduce the risk of relapse, we investigated a myeloablative toxicity-reduced allograft (aSCT) consisting of i.v. BU and CY followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy in 33 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who relapsed following an autograft after a median of 12 months. The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality at 1 year was 6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0-14). After a median interval of 168 days following aSCT, 24 patients started with a median dose of 5 mg (r, 5-15) lenalidomide without dexamethasone. During follow-up, 13 patients discontinued lenalidomide owing to progressive disease (n=6), GvHD (n=3), thrombocytopenia (n=2), or fatigue (n=2). Major toxicities of lenalidomide were GvHD II-III (28%), viral reactivation (16%), thrombocytopenia (III-IV°,16%), neutropenia (III/IV°, 8%), peripheral neuropathy (I/II°, 16%), or other infectious complication (8%). Cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years was 42% (95% CI: 18-66). The 3-year estimated probability of PFS and OS was 52% (95% CI: 28-76) and 79% (95% CI: 63-95), respectively. Toxicity-reduced myeloablative allograft followed by lenalidomide maintenance is feasible and effective in relapsed patients with MM, but the induction of GvHD should be considered. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0268-3369 1476-5365 |
DOI: | 10.1038/bmt.2012.142 |