Development and psychometric evaluation of the Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Diary

• Published in: Clinical and experimental gastroenterology Vol. 12; pp. 93 - 103
• Main Authors: Fehnel, Sheri, Fiedorek, Fred T, Nelson, Lauren, DiBenedetti, Dana, Spence, Sharon, Carson, Robyn T
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New Zealand Dove Medical Press Limited 01.01.2019; Taylor & Francis Ltd; Dove Medical Press
• Subjects: Abdomen; Care and treatment; Clinical trials; Data collection; Diabetes; Diaries; Focus groups; Gastroenterology; instrument; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Nausea; Original Research; Pain; Patient assessment; patient-reported outcome; Pharmaceutical industry; Product development; Qualitative research; Quality of life; Quantitative psychology; relamorelin; Vomiting; Ireland; United States > US; patient-reported outcome; instrument; diabetes; relamorelin
• ISSN: 1178-7023; 1178-7023
• DOI: 10.2147/CEG.S184016

Diabetic gastroparesis (DG) is defined as delayed gastric emptying with associated gastrointestinal symptoms, without mechanical obstruction. Patient-reported symptoms are critical for diagnosis and evaluation of treatment benefit in DG. The Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Diary (DGSSD), a new patient-reported outcome measure, was developed for use in clinical trials to support product approval and labeling claims for DG treatments. Initial DGSSD development was based on a review of the existing instruments and qualitative research (focus groups and cognitive debriefing interviews) in 41 patients with DG. Psychometric evaluations (individual items and composite scores) were conducted using data from Phase IIa and IIb relamorelin clinical trials. Qualitative research in patients with DG resulted in a six-item DGSSD, included in the Phase IIa trial, addressing symptom severity for nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, early satiety, and bloating, as well as vomiting frequency. An item addressing severity of postprandial fullness (PPF) was subsequently added based on regulatory advice and included in the Phase IIb trial. Measurement properties were generally strong for weekly averages of daily item and composite scores. Item-level intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.79 to 0.97 and correlations with other measures matched hypothesized patterns; the discriminating ability and responsiveness of the DGSSD were also supported. Multiple methods supported the computation of a composite score based on items addressing nausea, abdominal pain, bloating, and PPF severity. Qualitative and quantitative evidence support use of the DGSSD as a reliable and valid measure from which to derive endpoints to evaluate treatment benefit in future DG interventional trials.