模拟酸雨对鼎湖山季风常绿阔叶林土壤呼吸的初期影响

通过在鼎湖山季风常绿阔叶林(季风林)进行野外模拟酸雨试验,对不同酸雨强度处理下的林地土壤呼吸速率进行原位测定,探讨酸雨对南亚热带森林土壤呼吸的初期影响。结果表明:在两年的测定周期内,4个酸雨水平:CK(pH值4.5左右的天然湖水)、T1(pH值4.0)、T2(pH值3.5)和T3(pH值3.0)处理下的年平均土壤呼吸速率分别为(3.07±0.08)、(3.06±0.17)、(2.78±0.29)和(2.56±0.08)μmol·m^-2·s^-1,其中T3处理显著低于CK和T1处理(P〈0.05),说明模拟酸雨抑制了季风林土壤呼吸。这种抑制作用大体上随处理时间的延长而逐渐显著,处理间的差异只在...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in广西植物 Vol. 36; no. 2; pp. 145 - 153
Main Author 梁国华 吴建平 熊鑫 吴小映 褚国伟 周国逸 曾任森 张德强
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 华南农业大学,广州,510642%中国科学院华南植物园,广州510650 2016
中国科学院大学,北京100039%中国科学院华南植物园,广州,510650
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1000-3142
DOI10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201504032

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:通过在鼎湖山季风常绿阔叶林(季风林)进行野外模拟酸雨试验,对不同酸雨强度处理下的林地土壤呼吸速率进行原位测定,探讨酸雨对南亚热带森林土壤呼吸的初期影响。结果表明:在两年的测定周期内,4个酸雨水平:CK(pH值4.5左右的天然湖水)、T1(pH值4.0)、T2(pH值3.5)和T3(pH值3.0)处理下的年平均土壤呼吸速率分别为(3.07±0.08)、(3.06±0.17)、(2.78±0.29)和(2.56±0.08)μmol·m^-2·s^-1,其中T3处理显著低于CK和T1处理(P〈0.05),说明模拟酸雨抑制了季风林土壤呼吸。这种抑制作用大体上随处理时间的延长而逐渐显著,处理间的差异只在测定周期的第二年达到显著水平,且抑制作用的差异显著性只出现在湿季(P〈0.05)。模拟酸雨对土壤呼吸的抑制作用可能与其胁迫下土壤酸化而导致土壤微生物异养呼吸及凋落物CO_2释放量下降有关。表现为模拟酸雨导致土壤pH值降低,使得土壤酸化加剧;降低了土壤微生物量碳、氮含量,抑制了微生物活性;提高了凋落物质量残留率,抑制了凋落物分解。还与土壤呼吸结果相对应,上述指标对模拟酸雨的响应也大体上随处理时间的延长而逐渐显著。另外,土壤呼吸温度敏感系数Q_(10)值随处理pH值降低有下降的趋势,表明酸雨处理在一定程度上降低了土壤呼吸的温度敏感性。
Bibliography:Determining the effects of elevated acid rain on forest soil respiration can provide useful information for understanding of the process of carbon cycle of forest ecosystem and its response to global change.Therefore,a simulated acid rain(SAR) experiment was conducted in a monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest at the Dinghushan Nature Reserve.SAR treatments included CK(the local lake water,pH4.5),T1(pH4.0),T2(pH3.5),T3(pH3.0) with three replicates.SAR experiments were initiated in June 2009 and were sprayed twice a month during the study period.Responses of soil respiration to SAR were studied from April 2010 to March 2012 with a LI-8100 soil CO_2 efflux system.The results showed that mean annual soil respiration rates for the CK,T1,T2,and T3 treatments were(3.07 ±0.08),(3.06±0.17),(2.78±0.29),(2.56±0.08) μmol·m~(-2)·s~(-1),respectively,and the T3 treatment was significant lower than the CK and T1 treatments(P〈0.05),indicating that soil respiration was depressed under SAR.These negative effects were evident i
ISSN:1000-3142
DOI:10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201504032